Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
El autor de este tema ha marcado una publicación como la respuesta a su pregunta.
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
If its the first one you should contact your lawyer not complain on a message board.
If its the second you need to look at steam and rimworld terms of conditions. Because I believe that because there is no money involved you are giving away the mod for free and its user a free use liscense.
Restore justice!
TLDR - Verdict - Some action regarding Copyright for a few of those items could be enforceable because of their unique designs. Some could not, since they're not unique artistic depictions or depictions of unique items as well as some representing the work of other designers/manufacturers. Any contractual obligations must be adjudicated by civil authorities.
ADDED IMPORTANT NOTE: Sorry, I had to scoot out to take care of something - The "Theft" of one's property and "work", whether or not there is a concern of Copyright ownership, is always actionable. So, it doesn't matter if Copyright applies here or not or whether or not these are entirely derivative works of common items - The original work that went into these entirely original works and the rights to own these files in-and-of-themselves is still retained. What bears on that is whether or not Steam/Valve has claimed ownership of any submitted Workshop items. (Not uncommon for hosts, just bears on who would have redistribution/reproduction complaints.)
The work is Copyrighted on "creation" by the creator. There's no need to register it in any way. Though, various forms of confirmation/registration can be helpful to confirm provenance/creator.
There is also no monetary exchange or pre-requisite necessary for a valid copyright claim - "Free" items/work retain Copyright privileges for their creators.
"Trademarked" items are a different sort of animal.
And, in today's electronic world where "graphics" are involved, the entire situation can be murky...
In the above, however, the items displayed as "original works" are actually depictions of common things and, in some cases, of specific weapon designs that are, themselves, the creation of others.
Can I get full Copyright protection for my drawing of a common water glass in-and-of-itself? Not likely... As "art," the work is mine. But, if it is indistinguishable from a "common object" then "No," I can't claim Copyright protection for all works that look as if they are similar to mine of a common everyday thing.
Some of these graphic items depict weapon designs that are "commonly known." They would not likely be eligible for general Copyright protection. Depictions of "unique" weapons, however, would likely be eligible. So, some of them are likely protected and some are not.
Contractual obligations, verbal or written, should be enforced by Civil authorities.
Further, this work appears to have been produced in concert with another, but I am unsure of the actual working relationship. If, for instance, the artist was being paid or contracted to produce the art for the mod creator, without specific protections in place, that work is the property of the contracting person. This is why the rights for a cartoon can be owned by the publisher, even though it was artistically created by an artist hired by the publisher to produce it.
As a general thing in "mod" communities, most of them consider work produced by others to retain a sort of "gentleman's agreement" of some kind of exclusive protection or copyright.
Verdict - Some action regarding Copyright for a few of those items could be enforceable because their of unique designs. Some could not, since they're not unique artistic depictions or depictions of unique items. Any contractual obligations must be adjudicated by civil authorities.
*I am not an attorney. :)
Note: I am unsure whether or not the OP was "working with" the other modder or if their previously constructed mod was incorporated, wholesale and directly, into another mod and that's where the problem lies. At first glance, it appeared that there was some form of working relationship involved here that is not well-defined due to a language barrier.
And, this is all just my "opinion."
Reference for an easily digestible review of US Copyright Law, which would apply in this case due to Steam/Valve EULA/TOS - https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/how-to-copyright-a-graphic-design
Oh, wait you're ivan, well then ivan just re-upload the mod with you'r name and erase his.
Glad to hear about it. Good luck releasing your work on your own time and your own terms!