Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You could add quality to the transmission, but this won't solve sportiness issues. That said, a better question is whether you need sportiness in first place. A 100hp family sedan is not exactly expected to be sporty, it's expected to be reliable, but not to run races. For what it's worth, my experience with both technologies is that Automation nailed both of them. The Windstar I once drove had a nice kick, but the transmission was a constant source of problems, and it never particularly liked hard accelerations. The Volvo S40, with a manual transmission and much lighter weight, was very sporty, and it wasn't the transmission that broke. Both cars had about 200hp under the hood, the latter had a turbo (which was the source of most of its woes). Of course, it didn't help that generation of Windstar was essentially one of those V6 Mustangs stuffed into a Van body, and it showed when hauling stuff.