Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Driveability brake fade, and to a lesser extent utility brake fade (for certain demographics) is the most important type of fade to be concerned with.
To add a bit more to this, sportiness brake fade measures repeated braking events from high speed in quick succession as expected on a racing track, which means the brakes stay hot through not having a chance to cool down between braking events.
Real world, normal day to day driving, it's very unlikely that you'll ever need to do two or
more emergency stops sufficiently close that this is an issue, and pretty much any braking system designed to handle normal road braking is going to suffer if used in a track environment; if a typical emergency stop scenario is 70mph to zero once, and you start demanding multiple 100+mph stops in quick succession from that same braking system, you are repeatedly putting more than twice the kinetic energy through the system than it was intended for. It's going to suffer...
Without loading the game up to check, a sportiness brake fade test is probably putting ten, maybe twenty times the energy into the brakes over a drivability brake fade test.