Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thanks for the tip, I'll have to keep that mind. I was thinking of running with a I was thinking of using a DOHC this time around.
I'm essentially trying to create a racing circuit engine
2. lighter materials. Making it lighter massively reduces the forces involved, which means provided strength isn't compromised, you get more rpm. (downside is this is usually more expensive)
3. better manufacturing process. Casting is cheap and quick, but doesn't really give good performance. Forging is an improvement but more expensive and time consuming, while machining from billet is wasteful but the best available in Automation. (there are other methods becoming used, most notably single crystal casting, but typically they are only used in aircraft engineering at the moment; at the lower end you have 3D printing, which could be used to 3D print components, but you wouldn't want them for a high rpm application)
4. Big bore. That is, if you are looking to actually produce power, not just a technical exercise; bigger bore does come with the limitation that it makes the piston heavier, which increases stresses on the whole system, and massively increases the weight of the whole engine because of the larger engine block it requires.
5. Use more cylinders for the same capacity; again, makes the rotating elements of the system lighter (although increases overall weight) and therefore easier to rev. Much more expensive to design and build.
6. Keep in mind Automation is designed to model road cars, touring/GT racing cars at a push. It is not designed to handle motorcycle engines (where there have been production engines with over 20k rpm in the case of 1990's 250cc/400cc machines) or highly strung or race engines; in the real world, even 9k rpm covers almost every car on the market.
7. More valves and better valve operating. One of the limits on internal combustion engines is how quickly you can get the new air/fuel mixture in and the old one out. (or partially recycled back in as is common in trying to get the most energy out of the fuel) While the best method is electronically controlled pneumatic valves that have no cams at all, there are almost no road car manufacturers that uses it due to the higher costs. (been in F1 for decades though)
8. exhaust tuning. Much more relevant at high rpm than low rpm, length of exhaust (which you can't adjust in Automation) and diameter of exhaust (which you can) affect how well you can pulse the exhaust to better optimise gas flow, which improves high rpm torque. This is much less significant for Automation's turbocharged engines however, as you are limited on the types of manifold. (Automation's turbos are equivalent to 80's technology)
Last night, I manged to make a decent I4 at 9,000 RPM's with 200 HP. Right now, still trying to make a I4 with a dochc that will put out something like 250 HP at 10K-11K RPM's. I'm trying to do on a 1980's car. I haven't gotten around to designing a modern car just yet.