Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This was, after all, one of the main plot points in both the witcher 1 and the witcher 2.
I must admit, I never got quite this negative an immage of Triss during playing the first two games.
I realised that Triss wasn't very forthcomming about certain details of Geralt's previous live.
And yes, her help in regaining his memory wasn't all that grand. But as he was making progress in regaining his memory notheless, I didn't suspect her of sabotaging the process and put any lack of material help from her down to events in the story getting in the way and having a higher priority.
Also, I never saw any real evidence of a spell in the working. I mean, Geralt plowing an attractive woman? Since when does he need a spell on him to do that?
And other character spelling the truth about Triss out for Geralt, and he making her 'fess up at the end of W2?
Either I somehow managed to blunder around that, or my memory is even more leaky than I thought, since I can't realy recall that.
Also, I didn't realy seem to have come up when they mett again in Novigrad and conspired to piss off as many persons of authority as they could.
Just a couple of screaming examples from TW2:
- if Geralt overcomes the desire in elven baths, he gets magic resistance;
- if Geralt chooses to go with Iorveth to Vergen, he will find out what Rose of Remembrance is actually needed for: it makes the victim a faithful servant of the mage.
W2 has many different final act variations, unlike W3. You could entirely miss quest lines and character developments. You may never find out the truth about the dragon if you only go Roach path.
Same with deciding how ro proceed with final parts of Act 3
For example, there is a moment (in "Iorveth's path") where Roche appears like "a piano in bushes" and behaves the way he does. And there is only one line that explains it. And the line is accessible only if the Player has chosen not to go with Iorveth after Flotsam.
Bam!
One should play TW2 several times using different decisions to understand its plot.
This... and we don't even get a chance to kill her in Witcher 3...
Just pointing out there is more than two choices. A, B, Both, Neither. Probley more than that, but I don't need more clutter in my life.
Sit down and take a breath.
She was using you the whole time.
Geralt recovered his memory and finally realised that it was Yennefer he loved and not Triss, who was a friend...
He learns of Yennefer's whereabouts and so sets off to find her.
Again...Triss manipulated you from that first day in Kaer'Morhen, she used you to gain influence with Foltest, she took the opportunity to have sex with you against your wishes as Geralt had rebuffed her in the past..;I could go on.
EDIT: It's in fact a huge design error because players reality is Triss, no way Yennefer, and Gerald could remind all his past and emotions of past, but the game failed achieve change player memory.