Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I wonder if that's their way of avoiding royalties or if they just happened to make a game that half the player base thinks is influenced by Firefly. Some mighty huge coincidences.
That added a lot to the feel and I think the style of music and outer space location are really the only things it has in common with the show. Well maybe the junkiness.
also there was a persophone in Matrix:reloaded (monica belluci)
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Persephone-Descending-Dan-Gray/dp/0595129803 a sci-fi book pre-dating firefly... so Dan Gray should get royalties from Firefly?
And the Korian ships that look remarkably similar to Reaver vessels. The Barracuda is even colored the same.
What I meant was, they are certainly making money off people who believe this game was inspired by the Firefly/Serenity universe. Apparently it wasn't, but perception can easily become reality when you are dealing with intellectual properties. Granted, a lot of things can be coincidental in a genre where much of the content is similar in nature, but I would be absolutely shocked if these developers never watched Firefly and/or the Serenity movie. How much of it subconsciously makes its way into the design process? Who knows.
But I guess I kind of see your point, if you had one. Thing is, intellectual property isn't a black and white issue. There is no copyright on "sci-fi spaceship adventures", but when the tone of content can by mistaken as being related to copyrighted content, things become more rigid. The first major instance that comes to mind is the WWF's lawsuit against WCW Nitro for copyright infringement of intellectual property (IP). In 1996 or so, a major star from WWF went onto WCW television and used two words "Hey Yo" and had a toothpick in his mouth, and that was grounds enough for WWF to take WCW to court and sue. A toothpick and two words. Those two words and the toothpick were considered IP. I can provide the references for that, but I'm pretty sure it's common knowledge. There are thousands of other examples, but I bring that one up because the WWF actually won the suit or at least stopped their competition from ever coming close to IP infringement ever again. The point is, that's how blurry and thin the lines are when it comes to intellectual property.
"One of the randomly generated system names is Persephone"
I think we can asume that randon is random. In my game, one of the systems has the same name as my surname. can I claim for that?
Claim or not, that's pretty fantastic.
I think that system will have to become your new home.
With how lawyered up corporations are, especially Hollywood studios like the ones Joss Whedon works for, I think it would have been safer to avoid any possible references to Firefly. I don't know if you live in the US, but copyright lawsuits are a dime a dozen here, as are frivilous lawsuits of every conceivable origin. Especially when you are dealing with entertainment properties. Even if you ignore the Korian designs, Reaver coloring and the name, the music alone could literally have been taken directly from the series soundtrack. You'd think that one or the other could be coincidence, so why not just be safe and completely avoid designs and names if you want to use the music? Like it or not, Firefly happened before and was, to my knowledge, the only "western-themed piracy sci-fi" property to become hugely successful. I really doubt anyone at Warner Bros. or whatever is concerned at all, but imagine if this game were a AAA title and sold 20 million copies. You'd be naive to think that copyright lawyers from Hollywood wouldn't at least look at the game and make a judgement call. We're talking about millions of dollars here. Obviously this game is tiny by comparison, but that's beside the point.
I don't know if you've read the reviews, but more than half of them mention Firefly. Did the developers accidentally make a game that has a huge sci-fi nerd following, which also happens to be the same target audience of the show? I doubt there was intent there, but I think it's worthy of discussion. That's all.
I did a quick Google search of 'copyright infringement' and as an example, I found this:
http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/16/01/06/1757233/cbs-others-sued-for-copyright-infringement-over-soft-kitty-in-big-bang-theory
Those are song lyrics being whispered to a sleeping child, with no musical score or anything behind them, but the heirs to the copyright felt it infringed on a poem their mother wrote decades ago. And the ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up part is they have a good case. That's the state of entertainment properties in our sue-happy world. Clearly you don't see or think there is any similarity to the Firefly IP, but lots of other people do, and like I said - perception is reality in Hollywood lawyer circle jerks.
I think Firefly may be an influence, but there are others. Ever time I tractor cargo, I want to start calling myself Jafs (IW2). The use of ships labeled as bombers/torpedoes reminds me of Freespace. The combat feels very Freelancer. I think overall this game takes a lot of the best of games and shows I love and rolled them all together in a way that works.
I can agree with that. I was surprised to hear the developers say Firefly wasn't even an influence and any similarity is coincidental. There are lots of coincidences, I guess.