Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
However, criticizing Catherine's plan is legitimate. Her plan doesn't achieve much, because they cannot go back from the ARK to normal life, it's a one way street. Unless aliens come soon, find the facility at the bottom of the ocean, reverse engineer human computers and all the research data, and then find the satellite. So while her plan preserves some people's consciousness for some thousands of years, the chances of retrieving them are fairly low.
On the other hand WAU offers something more tangible, even though by human perception it's disfigured and repulsive. Also, without the WAU, it doesn't mean that intelligent life will not evolve and thrive again, it's just going to take a lot more time. Which is again better than Catherine's plan.
You have no way to know how the WAU will handle the evolution. I don't think the evolution should be replicated artificially. If you destroy the WAU at least you make sure the ocean species still alive won't get captured by the gel and can naturally create a marine biome once again.
What
She doesn't have to suffer a pointless and hopeless existence on earth like Simon-3 does. She completed her goal and conveniently her cortex chip corrupted right after Simon launched the ARK. In a way, it's almost like she won the coin flip, although there obviously never was a real coin flip in the first place.