Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
LMAO 4090 is much faster in games. Yes you will find a handful games being a bit faster on a 7900xtx but that's like 0.00001% of all games. Also, in pure RT 4090 is like 200-500% faster depending on the game. So yes, 7900xtx is a cuck low budget card.
Not a chance. 9700XT is a budget 500 usd card. Will probably be on par with 7900xt or alike. Not even the top 9000 series card will manage to beat 4090 in pure ray tracing.
Also water does not have RT reflections.
I wasn't going for a 4090, but for a 4080 for quite a time = 10 days until refund (EU laws are nice on that : 15 days to test something). Can't tell, but one thing I'm confused about it's the volume AMD cards are giving to visuals. With all NVidia cards to date it has always been ... a bit flat & blurry (but with a bit of a better speed, that is for sure).
And no, 7800XT & 7900XT/XTX are totally capable of doing wonders on RT/PT, especially with 16 / 20 / 24 Gb of Vram respectively.
Anyway, it's easy to notice the difference between AMD & NVidia : just look at their respective blogs and see how open AMD is and how secretive is Nvidia. If I've got something good to show, I won't hide behind fancy advertisement words, I explain with actual math.
https://gpuopen.com/learn/neural_supersampling_and_denoising_for_real-time_path_tracing/
that's simply not true. AMD 7000 series GPUs aren't even on par with NV 3000 series cards in terms of PURE, FULL RT. Just look at the 3D mark full RT benchmark. It's not even close.
Those who have been salty or naughty do not bother Santa does not read those letters.
And i still run all games maxed 1440p 60 fps which means that the only reaosn to get one of those new cards will be to sayon the forums that ihave one of the best cards and not because ir ealy need it
Oh so you played all those other games doing path-tracing on vulcan? How did they perform? And while we're at it, I'd love to check them out, can you tell me of some for my next games to play?
Least Intelligent Nvidia Fanboy lmao.
Imagine calling the 7900XT and XTX low level. They outperform the 4070Ti and 4080 Super respectively.
Cant compare them to the 4090. Its double the price of the XTX. Fanboys sucking Nvidia ♥♥♥♥ is so annoying.
Was easy to misunderstand though, since you explicitly said raytracing in the title.
With ray-tracing it's a different story. There the 7900 XTX often even falls behind the 4070 Ti and is 40 to 50% slower than an RTX 4090 and only less than 10% faster than the 7900 XT which falls behind the 4070 Super.
These number come from a re-test by German magazine PCGH from Mach 2024. Older reviews by sites like Tom's Hardware show similar results.
Nope. 7900XTX is WAY behind in pure RT and PT performance of a 4080. Just look at the DXR pure RT test of 3D mark. Don't take it with me, take it with the data.