Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Im still playing RDR2 often, and its sad to see an 2018 massive open world game got much much better graphics and details overall.
Indy is still a fun game though :)
But other than that there is almost nothing bad about the gfx.
I can barely distinguish some scenes from reality due to the perfect lighting and shadowing.
I imagine dlss is being used to achieve 80-100fps at max settings with a 3080ti.
I wear glasses and I don't think it looks bad.
I just don't think it looks so amazing that my 4090 should need DLSS and FG to get over 60 fps maxed out in 4k.
There are games that look a lot better and don't have to be played w/DLSS-balanced to get 40 fps with RT/PT in 4k.
Someone gets it. The game looks good, but I do not see how it warrants such massive system requirements.
I play with everything maxed at 4k. The game looks great but I am not amazed.