Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
i get 60~fps 2560x1080 native, low/med.
70s to 80s for me @ 4k native. max settings. I don't think you can turn on fully ray tracing with amd cards tho.
Why in gods name would you lock your FPS to 60? We back in 2015?
I upped it to 70, is that better? Rather than have the gpu run at 100% just to eek out 5 or 10 more fps I tend to lock it at something slightly lower. It's not like this is a game that requires a high frame rate and low latency.
Weirdest thing I've heard in 25 years of PC gaming.
When higher than 60 fps monitors weren't the norm and people would cap their FPS at 60 maybe?
Maybe? you don't know what you were saying?
I explain what I mean and then you give me that response? And no they weren't the norm in 2015.
Yes because both things you said were nonsense and you finished your sentence with a question mark as if you were not sure. Also whether or not they were the most popular in 2015 120+Hz monitors were easy to find and reasonably priced.
You being ill informed is no reason to be an asshat to someone trying to enjoy a game.
About as Id expect given my rig is getting older now.