安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
该主题的作者已标记一个回帖作为问题的解答。
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
A Chinese enthusiast modder alone could make binary patch to replace AVX2 with AVX for GoWR and Alan Wake 2.
Developers who have the source code can do it basically with one compiler option. Naughty Dog made a separate AVX-only .exe for their Uncharted PC port like within a week and Last Of Us was already released with 2 .exe files both for AVX2 and AVX-only CPUs.
If a computer's build works well enough for someone to use it and be happy with its results, then let them use it. How could it possibly effect you? Making games AVX2 only gatekeeps people willing to play games on lower settings. Why would you bother buying new gear to play on higher settings when you can just play it on medium or lower and it doesn't bother you? The settings are there for a reason, let people use them.
Its not the biggest flex, but I can run modern games on high with my old rig from 2012 sans the old GPU, only thing I ever changed. Heck I didn't even get a super modern GPU, just a good one on sale for $300.
I don't know if it's because you need to justify your purchases, like perhaps you feel guilty for spending so much money on something you don't need, or maybe you just like to argue over the internet as a stress relief, or if trolling is just that fun... Hell maybe its being a toxic fanboy over a company or game. But allowing companies to gatekeep hurts everyone. They will come up with new things and force it into games just to make sure people continue to buy more crap they don't need just to play a game that doesn't actually need that program or hardware to run it, just to run it on ULTRA or something.
And for the people who do actually feel guilty for buying expensive gear or those who feel the need to flex their rigs or wallets and use this kind of situation as a way to justify their purchases, those who belittle or demean others with less expensive or older hardware... this is your hobby or passion. You don't need to justify it, just enjoy it. Why bring others down and insult them?
Will there be a time when an upgrade is actually needed? Of course, such is the curse of technology. At some point our old or less expensive hardware will be just too old, and we will have to get something newer. But don't force it with gatekeeping and false requirements. Let it happen naturally.
And for anyone thinking I don't know what I'm talking about or that I myself am coping similar to the folks I reference above. I will admit, my degree is in cyber security so I'm not a professional PC builder to be fair, but my knowledge of computers is above average at least. Plus you know.... me like games... It's a delightful hobby so I try to learn about it.
As for coping, I'm 100% trying to cope with the gatekeeping for sure. But none of us should have to throw money at a problem that was manufactured for us. What is the saying?.... Manufacture the problem and sell the solution? Seems apt to the situation I feel. I don't want any of you spending money you don't have to. The world is expensive and enough people are out to get you as it is.
This has been bugging me for a while and this seemed like as good a thread as any, since its new maybe more folks will see it. Thank you for coming to my TED talk.
I will now hit post and probably forget about this thread so... best wishes everyone, stay safe out there. Odds are they will update and make AVX2 optional like RDR2 so this whole conversation is moot anyway.
This is only possible when the game is compiled with avx2 but doesn’t actually utilise it,
It working with other games is no guarantee it works with this one, just buy current hardware, avx2 is over a decade old
Every cpu that meets the requirements supports avx2.
Upgrade already, decade old hardware shouldn’t be expecting support.
AVX2 removed by devs with the "after release" patch
- Uncharted 4
- Spiderman Remastered
- Ratchet and Clank
AVX2 removed by community with the "after release" *.exe FIX
- Ghost of Tsushima
- Horizon: Forbidden West
- Until Dawn
- God of War: Ragnarok
- Alan Wake 2
Again: Every cpu that meets the minimum requirements has avx2 support.
And as I already said, just because it was possible with other games doesn’t mean it will be possible with this one. Some games require it without actually using it.
Avx2 is over a decade old.
The thing is AVX2 in PC gaming currently is an artificial requirement - the same function implemented with only AVX performs nearly the same in most gaming scenarios. Most developers don't care about providing additional AVX-only executables but they should as there is still huge segment of gamers with legacy quite capable CPUs and it would boost game sales.
EDIT:
Just so that we're clear - your saying
"If your cpu doesn’t support avx2 it won’t run this game" is complete and utter bs
It seems to be you who is confused. If it is a compiler setting and a compiler setting alone that was toggled, then removing the requirement is as simple as recompiling without the setting.
If however you have code relying on avx2 instructions, its not as easy to remove
No, thats not what i said, i said that if your cpu doesn’t support avx2 your cpu doesn’t even meet the minimum hardware requirements.
Reading really aint that hard. What i meant with “it wont run anyways” is that it wont run the game properly
If your cpu doesn’t support avx2 it doesn’t even meet the minimum requirements.
Thats not even a hot take or anything, thats just a fact.
Its been a decade, if you want to play new releases you will need to keep your rig semi up to date, cpus really aren’t that expensive