93% positive, 200 reviews

[Walmart Balrog]

Of course people who paid $100 ($30 for playing a SINGLE PLAYER game 3 days early) would shill for this Bethesda SlopFlop. Will it even break 5K concurrent users this weekend?

[Magnus Aurelius, Bright Lord]

Originally posted by Walmart Balrog:

I know. Imagine playing a game that takes 20+ hours to beat, and needing to play HOURS(2+), or at least 10% of the game, to get a feel for if it is recommendable. Such high standards to attain, I know

It's okay to be indecisive, but there's no need to let it affect you to the point of insulting others.

[Walmart Balrog]

Originally posted by Hobotango:

Originally posted by Walmart Balrog:

I know. Imagine playing a game that takes 20+ hours to beat, and needing to play HOURS(2+), or at least 10% of the game, to get a feel for if it is recommendable. Such high standards to attain, I know

It's okay to be indecisive, but there's no need to let it affect you to the point of insulting others.

How does that insult you? are you a snowflake?

[Magnus Aurelius, Bright Lord]

Originally posted by Walmart Balrog:

Originally posted by Hobotango:

It's okay to be indecisive, but there's no need to let it affect you to the point of insulting others.

are you a snowflake?

I am.

Do you see how insults works on the internet. No one cares, because you don't know them, and they dont know you. I feel like you're trying to compensate for something by going online and trying to pick fight with people and insulting them. I could be anything you want really, does not affect me the slightest what you think of me.

But, like I said. Its okay to be indecisive. If it takes you several hours to know if you enjoy something or not. That's you, and there's no reasons for it to affect you to the point that you have to go online and insult people. It would be a good thing for you to realise that, not everyone is like you, and just because they are reviews out there with under 2 hours of game time, and that you cant seem to decide upon that time-frame, doesn't mean others cant. And there's nothing to be ashamed of it either. Just so you know.

[Walmart Balrog]

Originally posted by Hobotango:

Originally posted by Walmart Balrog:

are you a snowflake?

I am.

Do you see how insults works on the internet. No one cares, because you don't know them, and they dont know you. I feel like you're trying to compensate for something by going online and trying to pick fight with people and insulting them. I could be anything you want really, does not affect me the slightest what you think of me.

But, like I said. Its okay to be indecisive. If it takes you several hours to know if you enjoy something or not. That's you, and there's no reasons for it to affect you to the point that you have to go online and insult people. It would be a good thing for you to realise that, not everyone is like you, and just because they are reviews out there with under 2 hours of game time, and that you cant seem to decide upon that time-frame, doesn't mean others cant. And there's nothing to be ashamed of it either. Just so you know.

Imagine playing a game that takes 20+ hours to beat, and needing to play HOURS(2+), or at least 10% of the game, to get a feel for if it is recommendable. Such high standards to attain, I know

[Firmamento]

I've went back to Stalker 2. This Indy game feels every other new modern "slow, babies first stealth, collect notes, lots of talking about feelings, and try to be a movie" type of game.

I got bored, it's like a watered down Wolfenstien with an Indy theme. Dude plays like modern Indy too, out of breath after three punches and about to die from dragging a body ten feet. And what the hell is that slide? lol who slides on their ass like that, a cartoon character?

With the A Life mod in Stalker 2, at least feels like something new. I don't know how you guys are still eating up this boring ass game formula but I've gotten bored of it so much that apparently even my love for these movies and old Indy games can't push me to make it through this slog. Even looks like a feeble old man in some over sized Big clothes of a healthier larger person. One look at the dev talking about making Indy for new modern audience and I knew it was obviously not going to be something I'd like. I mean I'm old original Indy fan, why wouldn't the people who made Indy famous, the fans who already existed, be the target audience? I didn't even know any woke stuff in the game but feels just like those woke games only without much of the message, like it was made by inexperienced people.Just not a single original idea or even improved upon staple of games here in this title. I think lot of people just have no lives today, you see them live online, get emotional over everything, they are like junkies, will just eat up any escapism and get angry when you point out how generic and uninspired what they spend their time and money on is, which tells me that they know this lol. Sad state of gaming. Let the men back into the studios please.

[Cypher]

Originally posted by bshock:

Originally posted by Setian:

This game should have wat more reviews already...
Delta Force released yesterday has 9k (58% mixed) although it is free to play...

Its not a "tripple A"
And it currently has 90k players

This are normal numbers for a free to play game

The numbers for Indiana are not normal and should be way higher
But we all know why this is not the case

The heavy system requirements are going to prevent a lot of people from playing on PC. This game is going to do much better on console.

Console requires heavy upscaling and limited textures/lighting. But that is known and accepted there.

On PC, we cry when things don't run native at max at 60FPS.

Different platforms have different standards.

[Fņŏŕď]

Lol this is a great example of why I don't trust reviews anymore.
When every review is glowing it means nothing.

[Mick Savage]

Originally posted by Fnord:

Lol this is a great example of why I don't trust reviews anymore.
When every review is glowing it means nothing.

Those reviews repel me more than the others, because nothing is perfect.

[Anticitizen 1]

A whole lot of cope on this thread but this game is in fact, a flop. Peak of 6k concurrent is horrendously bad. You expect these numbers from a niche indie roguelike made by 10 people in 2 years. This a AAA game from a studio of 160 people. Do the maths...

As for people talking about Welfare Pass, if it was such a success of a service, this game would be available only there, same goes for Starfield. Also, this is a SP game with no replayability, it doesn't help the service which needs engagement hours. GP's idea of a successful game is either replayable slop like Starfield or a MP game.

[Fredwick]

Originally posted by Anticitizen 1:

A whole lot of cope on this thread but this game is in fact, a flop. Peak of 6k concurrent is horrendously bad. You expect these numbers from a niche indie roguelike made by 10 people in 2 years. This a AAA game from a studio of 160 people. Do the maths...

This will age like milk.

What's there to cope about? We're enjoying the game and laughing at you.

It's an objectively good game.
The reviews are in and they're exceptionally good.
The game releases tomorrow.
Good games are sold by spread of word.

[Cropox]

LMAO you got banned.

[Anticitizen 1]

Originally posted by Fredwick:

Originally posted by Anticitizen 1:

A whole lot of cope on this thread but this game is in fact, a flop. Peak of 6k concurrent is horrendously bad. You expect these numbers from a niche indie roguelike made by 10 people in 2 years. This a AAA game from a studio of 160 people. Do the maths...

This will age like milk.

What's there to cope about? We're enjoying the game and laughing at you.

It's an objectively good game.
The reviews are in and they're exceptionally good.
The game releases tomorrow.
Good games are sold by spread of word.

Talk about things that age badly, what's you prediction for the "real" or more accurately "realer" release? What would constitute an adequate release for this game given AAA budget?

[Fredwick]

Originally posted by Anticitizen 1:

Talk about things that age badly, what's you prediction for the "real" or more accurately "realer" release? What would constitute an adequate release for this game given AAA budget?

Fact: You haven't played this game.
Veredict: You're just making noises based on your feelings.

Edit: 600 pages of Steam community comments lmao. I don't mean to strip you of your source of validation in life.

[Anticitizen 1]

Originally posted by Fredwick:

Originally posted by Anticitizen 1:

Talk about things that age badly, what's you prediction for the "real" or more accurately "realer" release? What would constitute an adequate release for this game given AAA budget?

Fact: You haven't played this game.
Veredict: You're just making noises based on your feelings.

"Veredict"...

Perhaps next time check the spelling if you were attempting (in vain) to sound intelligent?

Your fact doesn't logically connect to the "verdict" because let's play videos exist. The combat is not merely bad here but it is actually pathetic, the "puzzles" are baby's first puzzle attempt and the stealth is completely compromised by braindead AI.

[Cypher]

Originally posted by Anticitizen 1:

Originally posted by Fredwick:

This will age like milk.

What's there to cope about? We're enjoying the game and laughing at you.

It's an objectively good game.
The reviews are in and they're exceptionally good.
The game releases tomorrow.
Good games are sold by spread of word.

Talk about things that age badly, what's you prediction for the "real" or more accurately "realer" release? What would constitute an adequate release for this game given AAA budget?

I want you to not enjoy gaming. Add this to the list of games you are banned and censored from.