Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://www.techspot.com/review/2865-intel-arc-gpu-experience/
Battlemage is my hope to shake things up as well though. And if *both* AMD and Intel don't try to capitalize that even the RTX 5060 is likely gonna have 8GB again (a decade after the RX 480!), then they'd be stupid. They've plenty of evidence by now to show that even on FHD, 8GB aren't here to last.
And my point about AMD is -- even if they support, they don't engage with it. People go: "Great, another Nvidia pre-launch benchmark for Stalker, where is AMD's?" Tech-wise, they're chasing tails anyway. Every time Nvidia does something, AMD follows. Raytracing, upscaling, whathaveyou. In a market like this, going with what is perceived as the tried and tested "tech leader" is sort of a safety net itself. Hundreds of bucks even for entry level GPUs and all -- doesn't matter who makes them. Of course this is psychological. But AMD aren't merely battling a value per Dollar war here. They're also coming from behind, perceived as (by now) always playing 2nd fiddle.
idk about that, mine would throttle sometimes, so i repasted it and it lasted 2 months then started throttling again. it was the sapphire nitro version as well... sold it to some sucker on ebay
It was in your shoes back at late 2019, but fortunately I went with team green and got the 2070 Super. I was building my current PC and the GPU on the market at that time was mostly the RTX 20 series, the GTX 16 series and RX580s. Then AMD announced the 5700 series of GPU and they are much better than the RTX 2070 that I was planning to get. The 5700XT cost the same as the RTX2070 while offering GTX1080Ti level of performance. However Nvidia soon responded with the Super series. Also not helping AMD is that the distributor for Radeon GPU in my country jacks up the prices for no reason, making them no cheaper than Nvidia's. Lastly the 5700 series launch with blower style coolers meanwhile Nvidia's Super cards came with aftermarket coolers day 1. In the end, I manage to get a good deal on the 2070 Super, which ends up costing just a hair above 5700XT and I went with team green. Looking back I am glad I made the right choice, with native support for DLSS and ray tracing, although I do admit I barely uses the latter.
The thing is that every single game is working fine on my AMD GPU so I am not mad that I chose "wrong", but the opposite, I still think that I made the right choice because if you enable FSR and FG, it's enough even for today's games... Indiana Jones is the only game I have ever seen to have this kind of lock for AMD users.
Raytracing performance cost can be different depending on how much raytracing the game does. This game uses it only for basic global illumination. More demanding are the path tracing options in this game, which aren't for RTX 2070.
GeForce Now service. I used it to play Star Wars Outlaws on my steamdeck. You purchase the lowest gier access to GeForce Now, you buy the game (on Steam, NOT in their service), you connect Steam account to GeForce Now, and voila it works tramendously well. Just don't forget to cancel the subscription once you finish the game.