TBH the $70 is the reason why this game is failing to sell

[Candy ✧]

Does the $10 extra dollars on the price tag really justify making the game less accessible to your only audience, gamers?

When you read all these discussions, articles, and rants from people asking why this game has such low reviews.... And then you look at the 8-15 hour playthrough most people have, not a lot of people are willing to spend nearly $100 for a less than 20 hour experience that they won't revisit.

How many more people would have gotten the game by now if it was listed at $50? $40?

Stop being greedy if you want your games to sell.

[Candy ✧]

Nguyên văn bởi Mick Salvage:

Nguyên văn bởi reorim:

Cannot be that bad, if Disney wants more:
https://www.gamesradar.com/games/action/indiana-jones-and-the-great-circle-was-successful-enough-that-disney-reportedly-picked-up-the-phone-and-wants-more/

What has Disney got right the last 10 years? ...lol

Not video games, thats for sure. Their Avengers game was delisted and removed. Their guardians of the galaxy game flopped, and marvel midnight suns, pretty much every marvel game has failed except spiderman which they sold to sony. thats why its taken until 2025 to get marvel games featuring popular superheros from like 2010. Heck, marvels rivals is literally a clone of overwatch with different looking characters and maps, but the maps have the same layouts and the characters have the same abilities. There is no creative passion there at ALL.

[Nightserg]

I agree with OP. The game's quality is of an AA, not an AAA and the price should've been 20 euros less. The fact that it's also on gamepass also killed its momentum and sales. The game is doing excellent on gamepass, but that isn't saying much since it's covered by Microsoft, so essentially MS is paying from their pockets towards Disney and thats why Disney considers it did fine.

Anyway, as long as these greedy big ass corporations fail/lose money it's fine with me. Let their greed kill them. We need better quality per price content.

[BRAN]

Nguyên văn bởi Candy:

Does the $10 extra dollars on the price tag really justify making the game less accessible to your only audience, gamers?

When you read all these discussions, articles, and rants from people asking why this game has such low reviews.... And then you look at the 8-15 hour playthrough most people have, not a lot of people are willing to spend nearly $100 for a less than 20 hour experience that they won't revisit.

How many more people would have gotten the game by now if it was listed at $50? $40?

Stop being greedy if you want your games to sell.

As long as you are not involved in selling this game, WHY would YOU care?
Don't worry, there are enough smart people worrying what price strategy to follow OVER TIME. Or just ranting over the price tag at street release day?

[Candy ✧]

Nguyên văn bởi BRAN:

Nguyên văn bởi Candy:

Does the $10 extra dollars on the price tag really justify making the game less accessible to your only audience, gamers?

When you read all these discussions, articles, and rants from people asking why this game has such low reviews.... And then you look at the 8-15 hour playthrough most people have, not a lot of people are willing to spend nearly $100 for a less than 20 hour experience that they won't revisit.

How many more people would have gotten the game by now if it was listed at $50? $40?

Stop being greedy if you want your games to sell.

As long as you are not involved in selling this game, WHY would YOU care?
Don't worry, there are enough smart people worrying what price strategy to follow OVER TIME. Or just ranting over the price tag at street release day?

Why are all these private, 0 level steam profiles replying so rudely? And why am I not allowed to express my opinion about a game I purchased if I'm not a developer of the game? What a dumb take. But thanks for replying!

[joridiculous]

Nguyên văn bởi Candy:

TBH the $70 is the reason why this game is failing to sell

No, GamePass is the reason it sell "poorly" on other platforms (steam), and that it is a Xbox/Steam "exclusive"

[reorim]

Nguyên văn bởi Candy:

Nguyên văn bởi joridiculous:

No, GamePass is the reason it sell "poorly" on other platforms (steam), and that it is a Xbox/Steam "exclusive"

Hey you know what else was released on gamepass and steam together day 1, but has not 5k reviews, but actually over 100k reviews? Starfield.

And that game is ♥♥♥♥ as hell and also 70$. Hence the reviews.
So you made your own starting point of this topic invalid.

[pariah]

Usually if a game is too much money for me.. I just add it to my wishlist and wait for a sale. I don't making posts about it crying like a child

[GAMING_Alligator]

Ummm ... the game is neither getting bad reviews, nor is selling badly. Your premise is faulty.

[pariah]

Nguyên văn bởi Candy:

Nguyên văn bởi pariah:

Usually if a game is too much money for me.. I just add it to my wishlist and wait for a sale. I don't making posts about it crying like a child

Sucks to be you, not everyone wants to wait 6 months after new games release lmao

I own the game?

If you're too poor to pay 70 bucks and too impatient to wait 6 months.. I don't know what else to tell you.

[Vezner]

Nguyên văn bởi Candy:

Does the $10 extra dollars on the price tag really justify making the game less accessible to your only audience, gamers?

When you read all these discussions, articles, and rants from people asking why this game has such low reviews.... And then you look at the 8-15 hour playthrough most people have, not a lot of people are willing to spend nearly $100 for a less than 20 hour experience that they won't revisit.

How many more people would have gotten the game by now if it was listed at $50? $40?

Stop being greedy if you want your games to sell.

Anyone with an 8-15 hour playthrough is only doing the main story. There's a lot of other stuff in the game that will at least double that play time, if not triple it. I have nearly 30 hours in this game and I still haven't finished it. I'm not rushing the experience and I'm trying to do all of the side missions that I can. In other words, I'm getting my money's worth out of this game. If someone bought it and sped their way through the main story, it boggles my mind that they would complain about how short the experience was. Frankly, that's on them, not the devs.

IMO $70 is a pretty fair asking price for this game.

[Mick Savage]

Nguyên văn bởi pariah:

Nguyên văn bởi Candy:

Sucks to be you, not everyone wants to wait 6 months after new games release lmao

I own the game?

If you're too poor to pay 70 bucks and too impatient to wait 6 months.. I don't know what else to tell you.

Has nothing to do with poverty or rich, it's charging AAA for an A game.

There is no denying, rich or poor $70 for this game that can be finished in an afternoon is a complete joke and everyone should be laughing at Bethesda for even trying it.

[pariah]

Nguyên văn bởi Mick Salvage:

Nguyên văn bởi pariah:

I own the game?

If you're too poor to pay 70 bucks and too impatient to wait 6 months.. I don't know what else to tell you.

Has nothing to do with poverty or rich, it's charging AAA for an A game.

There is no denying, rich or poor $70 for this game that can be finished in an afternoon is a complete joke and everyone should be laughing at Bethesda for even trying it.

Says the guy still playing call of duty in 2025 😂

[Mick Savage]

No way is this game worth $70 not by a long shot!

[Mick Savage]

Nguyên văn bởi pariah:

Nguyên văn bởi Mick Salvage:

Has nothing to do with poverty or rich, it's charging AAA for an A game.

There is no denying, rich or poor $70 for this game that can be finished in an afternoon is a complete joke and everyone should be laughing at Bethesda for even trying it.

Says the guy still playing call of duty in 2025 😂

Trashing other games doesn't make this one look better ...LOL

[pariah]

It's not worth 70 bucks if you're poor, I agree.