Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
She's almost on par with Helena Shaw, I'll give you that much. Almost. 😄
This is taken out of context, see:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD5UrAA6f1o&t=10m51s
(start video at 10:51).
First, Gina says: "Oh, thank God. Can you get these off me?", so she is really happy that Indy rescues her.
And then, when asking Indy about his plans and he replies that he wants to leave ("I'm saving you. Come one, let's go.") she says "I don't need to be saved." and then "We can't just leave now, we have to go after Voss.". So what she means by "I don't need to be saved." is that she finds the whole mission of having to stop Voss in his evil plan to be more important than escaping from the Nazi camp. That is, she wants to tell Indy that he doesn't need to take care of her from then on, so that they can continue to follow Voss. That is all. And fortunately Indy listened to her and they finally were able to stop Voss.
Exactly good point!
We see this all the time now in games and movies, they impose progressive virtues and even clothing\hair styles, even when it makes zero sense and doesn't even fit the story.
But they do it anyway because pushing woke is far more important than creating a quality video game for the masses.
Gina is "taking the lead" in small but too annoying ways. It can be described as Cossacks say "getting into the furnace before your dad".
- Indy opens a tomb, she's the first to rush in. Who cares about traps? Cutscenes explicitly emphasise that she's always going in first.
- "Let's go, Jones". You are a sidekick. You don't tell Indy to go, only he decides that.
The story is fiction but the setting clearly is not.
That being said, short haircuts were actually rather popular with women in 1930's Italy. Especially with women who were rebelling against traditional gender roles, which were made popular again under the fascist regime at the time. So Gina's haircut is actually spot on.
Doesn't change the fact that her character is shallow and boring at best and super annoying at worst :P
Would have actually been handy if there had been a mechanic for giving her simple orders on where to go or stand.
I'm sure that if the rescued character had been a man, the writers would never have made him respond in such an unsympathetic way. There is such a fear of representing women in a weak way in modern entertainment that empowerment is confused with antipathy.
You can be adventurous and self-sufficient and at the same time be grateful and humble... because that's exactly how Indiana Jones is and that's why he's a character that has been loved for decades.
again, it could have been so much worse. with how they wrapped up her story in the end I thought she was good. not great or very good. just good.
Do agree that her "I don't need to be saved. " came out of nowhere when she literally needed to be saved.
Still, not as bad as Ashley in the original resi 4.
Spoiler* The worst thing is she led Indy on. He opened up about losing his last trusting romantic relationship because she thought he was “stuck in the past”. Gina acts like she’s falling in love with Indy and at the end just chooses her career and heartlessly throws that line in his face even though he saved her ass a bunch of times and didn’t do anything wrong. “I wanna be a reporter and you’re stuck in the past and that’s what you get for being vulnerable”. [/spoiler