Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

View Stats:
This topic has been locked
talloyer Jan 20, 2024 @ 10:18pm
2
3
WOKE: "new Indiana Jones story for a modern gaming audience"
A guy(?) looking Woke, speaking Woke using Woke words. Oh, and Senior Narrative Designer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yp7_ImMV1Iw&t=314s
This concerns me far more than the first-person gameplay (though Machinegames is one of the very best into first-person perspective). And considering Machinegames loves to force unskippable "narative moments" in its games (Wolfenstein: Youngblood is THE exception since it is too light in Narrative, a blessing in disguise. And there was still Woke), is part of Xbox Game Studios, which is a client of Sweet Baby Inc., be assured there will be LOTS of Woke in "Indiana Jones and the Great Circle" (stupid subtitle). I am not looking forward to see Indiana Jones be "descontructed" by this "independent strong woman called Gina, apologizing all the time for being a male.
Moments like this made me dread whenever any company mentions the word "modern". Just imagine the Damage Ubisoft will do to Splinter Cell remake to appeal to the "modern audience" (off-topic)...
Last edited by talloyer; Jan 20, 2024 @ 10:22pm
Originally posted by Brohan Creates:
If people were smart, they wont even preorder this game and wait for loads of gameplay to see if they try to pull a fast one like they did with BG3 and Wokefield where you don't see it till more than 2 hours in cause then you can't get a refund from Valve. Pretty sure this game is getting 0 Preorders.
< >
Showing 46-60 of 92 comments
🍀 Feb 4, 2024 @ 12:59pm 
Originally posted by 𝐂𝐚𝐝𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐑:
Unchecking from wishlist in 3, 2, 1
I just did. Sweet Baby Inc. ruins anything it touches.
IndyBender Feb 4, 2024 @ 1:01pm 
Originally posted by AdahnGorion:
I am still not going to play it (atleast at release) because I am rather biased against Action Adventures, unless its a them that interest me a lot... and I don´t want an Indy VS Nazi rehash and it feels like it might be.

To your point about Indy vs. Nazis, we will definitely be fighting the Italian Fascists as well and not just Nazis, and perhaps even the Imperial Japanese Army, but I get your point. I'm always down to kick some Nazi ass personally, but having other foes to face is always nice too.
AdahnGorion Feb 4, 2024 @ 1:14pm 
Originally posted by IndyBender:
Originally posted by AdahnGorion:
I am still not going to play it (atleast at release) because I am rather biased against Action Adventures, unless its a them that interest me a lot... and I don´t want an Indy VS Nazi rehash and it feels like it might be.

To your point about Indy vs. Nazis, we will definitely be fighting the Italian Fascists as well and not just Nazis, and perhaps even the Imperial Japanese Army, but I get your point. I'm always down to kick some Nazi ass personally, but having other foes to face is always nice too.

I guess its because I have a bias against it, its not that I don´t like beating them, since I did that back in the 80´s and 90´s.. its just.. its too much.. I´ve done it to much.. Indy doing it once again, is not really bringing it into "modern society"

But it would be a nice if you were right about your guess with the Italians and Japanese.
Last edited by AdahnGorion; Feb 4, 2024 @ 1:14pm
IndyBender Feb 4, 2024 @ 1:43pm 
Originally posted by AdahnGorion:
Originally posted by IndyBender:

To your point about Indy vs. Nazis, we will definitely be fighting the Italian Fascists as well and not just Nazis, and perhaps even the Imperial Japanese Army, but I get your point. I'm always down to kick some Nazi ass personally, but having other foes to face is always nice too.

I guess its because I have a bias against it, its not that I don´t like beating them, since I did that back in the 80´s and 90´s.. its just.. its too much.. I´ve done it to much.. Indy doing it once again, is not really bringing it into "modern society"

But it would be a nice if you were right about your guess with the Italians and Japanese.
The Italian part isn't a guess, to be clear. In the Dev Direct and the trailer when they show Indy in combat in those jungle scenes the enemies are wearing green uniforms with Pith helmets, which is more of an Italian thing (although I don't think the Regio Esercito had a uniform that green? Looks pretty good though and it's not exactly important) AND the guns they're using are a (relative to 1937) modernized Beretta "Automatico" M1918, I believe the M1918/30. Now that I think about it, when Indy makes that third punch to the Indiana Jones theme he punches an Italian soldier, and at 2:06 the soldier there is definitely wearing an Italian Elmetto Mod. 33 helmet, alongside some fancy white gloves which might mean he's a part of some kind of ceremonial or honor guard-type unit. ALSO also, that dude that butterfinger's the vase at the end is definitely Italian.

The reason I say the Japanese are a likely foe as well is really hinging on the fact that Indy jumps to a Japanese plane, an aircraft that is an amalgamation of a couple of different Japanese air designs. Since it's also likely the location this takes place in the Battle of Shanghai, we could certainly have to fight off some IJA footmen inside the city or something.

As someone whose obsession with the Indy franchise could compete with Henry Sr.'s obsession with the Holy Grail, I'm pretty excited for the game since I've only played Staff of Kings and the Lego Indys, and the first-person aspect looks pretty unique for the genre. People have brought up the Riddick games as some of their work from before Machine Games and how it's a good game, which could tell us a bit about how the gameplay will feel. I'm mostly 'worried' about how fluid and enjoyable/gratifying the melee & whip combat will be, because I imagine it's a really complex system and it has to really look good since that'll be the focus.
AdahnGorion Feb 4, 2024 @ 1:47pm 
Originally posted by IndyBender:
Originally posted by AdahnGorion:

I guess its because I have a bias against it, its not that I don´t like beating them, since I did that back in the 80´s and 90´s.. its just.. its too much.. I´ve done it to much.. Indy doing it once again, is not really bringing it into "modern society"

But it would be a nice if you were right about your guess with the Italians and Japanese.
The Italian part isn't a guess, to be clear. In the Dev Direct and the trailer when they show Indy in combat in those jungle scenes the enemies are wearing green uniforms with Pith helmets, which is more of an Italian thing (although I don't think the Regio Esercito had a uniform that green? Looks pretty good though and it's not exactly important) AND the guns they're using are a (relative to 1937) modernized Beretta "Automatico" M1918, I believe the M1918/30. Now that I think about it, when Indy makes that third punch to the Indiana Jones theme he punches an Italian soldier, and at 2:06 the soldier there is definitely wearing an Italian Elmetto Mod. 33 helmet, alongside some fancy white gloves which might mean he's a part of some kind of ceremonial or honor guard-type unit. ALSO also, that dude that butterfinger's the vase at the end is definitely Italian.

The reason I say the Japanese are a likely foe as well is really hinging on the fact that Indy jumps to a Japanese plane, an aircraft that is an amalgamation of a couple of different Japanese air designs. Since it's also likely the location this takes place in the Battle of Shanghai, we could certainly have to fight off some IJA footmen inside the city or something.

As someone whose obsession with the Indy franchise could compete with Henry Sr.'s obsession with the Holy Grail, I'm pretty excited for the game since I've only played Staff of Kings and the Lego Indys, and the first-person aspect looks pretty unique for the genre. People have brought up the Riddick games as some of their work from before Machine Games and how it's a good game, which could tell us a bit about how the gameplay will feel. I'm mostly 'worried' about how fluid and enjoyable/gratifying the melee & whip combat will be, because I imagine it's a really complex system and it has to really look good since that'll be the focus.

I guess I must have missed that. I have not seen to much outside the official trailer.
The Lego indys were actually alright (played them with the young) so that I can accept.

Outside my bias, I actually think this game will be pretty decent to good and a great try for people that like Indy still.
IndyBender Feb 4, 2024 @ 2:11pm 
Originally posted by AdahnGorion:
Originally posted by IndyBender:
The Italian part isn't a guess, to be clear. In the Dev Direct and the trailer when they show Indy in combat in those jungle scenes the enemies are wearing green uniforms with Pith helmets, which is more of an Italian thing (although I don't think the Regio Esercito had a uniform that green? Looks pretty good though and it's not exactly important) AND the guns they're using are a (relative to 1937) modernized Beretta "Automatico" M1918, I believe the M1918/30. Now that I think about it, when Indy makes that third punch to the Indiana Jones theme he punches an Italian soldier, and at 2:06 the soldier there is definitely wearing an Italian Elmetto Mod. 33 helmet, alongside some fancy white gloves which might mean he's a part of some kind of ceremonial or honor guard-type unit. ALSO also, that dude that butterfinger's the vase at the end is definitely Italian.

The reason I say the Japanese are a likely foe as well is really hinging on the fact that Indy jumps to a Japanese plane, an aircraft that is an amalgamation of a couple of different Japanese air designs. Since it's also likely the location this takes place in the Battle of Shanghai, we could certainly have to fight off some IJA footmen inside the city or something.

As someone whose obsession with the Indy franchise could compete with Henry Sr.'s obsession with the Holy Grail, I'm pretty excited for the game since I've only played Staff of Kings and the Lego Indys, and the first-person aspect looks pretty unique for the genre. People have brought up the Riddick games as some of their work from before Machine Games and how it's a good game, which could tell us a bit about how the gameplay will feel. I'm mostly 'worried' about how fluid and enjoyable/gratifying the melee & whip combat will be, because I imagine it's a really complex system and it has to really look good since that'll be the focus.

I guess I must have missed that. I have not seen to much outside the official trailer.
The Lego indys were actually alright (played them with the young) so that I can accept.

Outside my bias, I actually think this game will be pretty decent to good and a great try for people that like Indy still.
I really hope that the game is good (and I think that, from the slim pickin's we've seen so far, it could really be pretty good) in part because I want younger generations (such as my own) to experience Indy and I'd love to watch people enjoying it as well. I hope we'll see more of the game real soon, but I suppose I can be patient, haha.
hareymon1 Feb 4, 2024 @ 9:35pm 
Originally posted by talloyer:
A guy(?) looking Woke, speaking Woke using Woke words. Oh, and Senior Narrative Designer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yp7_ImMV1Iw&t=314s
This concerns me far more than the first-person gameplay (though Machinegames is one of the very best into first-person perspective). And considering Machinegames loves to force unskippable "narative moments" in its games (Wolfenstein: Youngblood is THE exception since it is too light in Narrative, a blessing in disguise. And there was still Woke), is part of Xbox Game Studios, which is a client of Sweet Baby Inc., be assured there will be LOTS of Woke in "Indiana Jones and the Great Circle" (stupid subtitle). I am not looking forward to see Indiana Jones be "descontructed" by this "independent strong woman called Gina, apologizing all the time for being a male.
Moments like this made me dread whenever any company mentions the word "modern". Just imagine the Damage Ubisoft will do to Splinter Cell remake to appeal to the "modern audience" (off-topic)...

The very mention of the word "woke" in this context immediately sends shivers down my spine. It's as if these so-called "woke" individuals are taking over everything we hold dear and sacred. But let me tell you, it's not just about politics or social justice; it's about taking away our freedom to enjoy the things we love without being bombarded with their liberal nonsense!

First off, let me say that I am a true fan of Indiana Jones, having grown up watching the movies and playing the games. But this new "woke" version of the game has me worried, to say the least. The thought of seeing my beloved hero turned into some kind of social justice warrior is enough to make me want to throw up.

Now, I'm not saying that we should completely ignore the importance of representation and inclusivity in media. After all, it's 2024, and we've come a long way since the days when only white men were allowed to grace the screen. But there's a difference between incorporating diverse characters into a story and forcing an agenda down our throats. And from what I can tell, this new Indiana Jones game is going to be doing a whole lot of the latter.

Take, for example, the inclusion of Gina – the "independent strong woman" who seems to have taken over the entire game. Seriously, what's with all these women trying to steal the spotlight from our hero? It's bad enough that we had to put up with Lara Croft and her tomb raiding adventures, but now they want us to believe that a woman can be just as capable of solving mysteries and fighting off bad guys as Indiana Jones himself. Give me a break!

And let's not forget about the "woke" moments that are sure to pop up throughout the game – like when our hero is forced to apologize for being a man or when he's confronted with his own white privilege. I mean, really? Is this what we can expect from a beloved franchise like Indiana Jones?

I'm not saying that MachineGames can't make a good game – they certainly have the talent and experience to do so. But when you combine their track record of forcing unskippable "narrative moments" into their games with the fact that they are now part of Xbox Game Studios, which is infamous for its "woke" agenda, I can't help but feel a sense of impending doom.
IndyBender Feb 4, 2024 @ 11:49pm 
Originally posted by hareymon1:
Take, for example, the inclusion of Gina – the "independent strong woman" who seems to have taken over the entire game. Seriously, what's with all these women trying to steal the spotlight from our hero? It's bad enough that we had to put up with Lara Croft and her tomb raiding adventures, but now they want us to believe that a woman can be just as capable of solving mysteries and fighting off bad guys as Indiana Jones himself. Give me a break!

And let's not forget about the "woke" moments that are sure to pop up throughout the game – like when our hero is forced to apologize for being a man or when he's confronted with his own white privilege. I mean, really? Is this what we can expect from a beloved franchise like Indiana Jones?
That first paragraph CANNOT be a serious comment pffffffff. We've seen her for all of about... what, 10 seconds or so? At most? Setting aside the second half of that paragraph, Gina (which, again, we've barely seen anything of) really doesn't strike me as being that different from previous companions.

As for that... second half, I don't have a clue how it's even possible to say that with a straight face and MEAN IT. I mean, did we watch the same Indiana Jones movies? To only mention Marion's path of destruction in Raiders (and not even bring up the fact that she REGULARLY out-drinks people probably twice her size and more), she smacks a dude over the head with a log, shoots the guy that is poised to kill Indy, knocked a dude out with a frying pan, knocks out the pilot of the Flying Wing (who is also trying to get a shot off on Indy), utterly OBLITERATES an entire truck of Nazi grunts, and ultimately indirectly kills Pat Roach since she grabbed those brake blocks and caused the pilot to slump onto the plane's controls.

I don't think Willie really racked up the kills in ToD but I'm not surprised since she was a socialite and whatnot and therefore much more concerned about being brought WAAAAY out of her element. I think Elsa might be in a similar boat, since she didn't really do any killing but one could argue that she wasn't the sidekick (but one could also make the point that she was perhaps complicit in the death of those "volunteers" that lost their heads in the Grail Temple).

Which brings us back to Marion in KotCS, where she gets three Soviets killed by having a tree spring back and smack them off a cliff after escaping from those ants. Of course, it's not JUST about killing bad guys. Besides Elsa, all of the female leads in the movies saved Indy from certain death at some point or another. Elsa gets a pass in a way because she wasn't there to be an ally of Indiana Jones, though.

I could also, of course, make a joke about how Indy has always been a "social justice warrior" since he fights Nazis as his second profession, but of course it would depend on which way one would like to define that term.

I do agree that ignoring representation and diversity in media is not the right thing to do, heck, one of the more successful sitcoms of our time was Will & Grace, a show featuring a main character who was gay, and it aired (originally) for 8 seasons! While it's pretty well-known that she's not a great person now, Ellen DeGeneres was a huge television host too in the 2000s. There are also plenty of examples of characters in video games, even before the 21st century, who are a part of the LGBTQ community. However, we have no idea if that'll even be relevant in this particular game.

I really hope that was a bait/troll post because the 4th + 5th paragraphs were NUTS haha
Tanoomba Feb 5, 2024 @ 4:21am 
Originally posted by IndyBender:
I don't think Willie really racked up the kills in ToD but I'm not surprised since she was a socialite and whatnot and therefore much more concerned about being brought WAAAAY out of her element.
She did save Indy and Short Round from the descending ceiling, though. Having said that, Willie is by far the most heavily criticized character in the movie, as she spends most of it screaming obnoxiously. Her ineptitude came off as more annoying than funny, and it's not a coincidence that every other female lead was more interesting as well as stronger and more capable.

I just think it's profoundly silly for people to get pre-emptively angry about a game we know very little about. There is literally nothing to lose in simply waiting for its release and holding off judgement until then.
IndyBender Feb 5, 2024 @ 6:59am 
Originally posted by Tanoomba:
Originally posted by IndyBender:
I don't think Willie really racked up the kills in ToD but I'm not surprised since she was a socialite and whatnot and therefore much more concerned about being brought WAAAAY out of her element.
She did save Indy and Short Round from the descending ceiling, though. Having said that, Willie is by far the most heavily criticized character in the movie, as she spends most of it screaming obnoxiously. Her ineptitude came off as more annoying than funny, and it's not a coincidence that every other female lead was more interesting as well as stronger and more capable.

I just think it's profoundly silly for people to get pre-emptively angry about a game we know very little about. There is literally nothing to lose in simply waiting for its release and holding off judgement until then.
I do agree that Willie was fairly annoying overall, but I can see what they were trying to do with her character, and quite honestly if I was in her situation I'd probably whinge about not still being in whatever swanky living situation she was probably used to. She did save Indy and Short Round, yes, and the "WE... ARE GOING... TO DIE! :(" line is an absolute classic. Ultimately, her character did have its shortcomings but I think her character could be authentic for someone who is used to being in a more high-society life. I'm no expert, of course.

I definitely agree with you that casting judgement NOW is not the way to go. I would say that it is at least better to wait and see what else is shown about the game, since it's releasing this year and therefore we should (hopefully) be seeing a fair bit more soon. If someone's gonna be skeptical about the game, then okay, I don't expect to change your mind a whole lot. Personally, I'd be more skeptical about aspects of actual gameplay, but that's just me.
Strider Feb 6, 2024 @ 3:34am 
Originally posted by AdahnGorion:
Originally posted by Strider:
Well it has Todd Howard name on it. This is enought to deter me from spending cash. From the limited gamepaly shown, it gives off signs of repetitive gameplay and to top it off, it is for "modern auidence". All the right terms for another underwhelming Bethesda product, though this time I am not sure if they gonna use the sleazy and unapealing face of Pete Hines who will dance around while Todd will try to sell you air in plastic bottles yet again. I thought they gonna succeed with Starfield, but looks like the so called "ghaymurhs" started to catch on their antics.
Or it might be half decent game. There's that too, no matter how slim this chance might be.

Todd Howard is Executive Producer on the game.

I look forward to see if this does well on its primary platform (the xbox, where it is created for) and how PC gamers will react to it.
People project modern society trends to much into games, even when its not there tbh.. But I am still not going to play it (atleast at release) because I am rather biased against Action Adventures, unless its a them that interest me a lot... and I don´t want an Indy VS Nazi rehash and it feels like it might be.

Hopefully, not another Starflop.
Last edited by Strider; Feb 6, 2024 @ 3:36am
Vi-El Feb 7, 2024 @ 10:27pm 
Originally posted by IndyBender:
I'd be more skeptical about aspects of actual gameplay, but that's just me.

This. So much this. I have seen the trailer and for the gameplay? I must admit the game looks fricking boring. From a literal standpoint of this being an Indiana Jones game, I cannot think of Indi as being a FPS type Protagonist. Not that he cant shoot a gun or use his whip proper. Hell hes a pretty good fighter overall, no shade whatsoever.

But the trailer shows pre-game (more than likely) footage of a combat system that looks more than lackluster and boring to play with enemies who could shoot you at any moment but wont cause Indi's gotta whip.

Considering that Todd Howard is the Executive Producer on the game, this specifically has me more than worried. And hell, if the doomsayers in this thread end up being correct, it just adds to it. But as for the game itself? Everyone but IndyBender needs to stop with the doomposting. Woke here, Woke there, the word lost its fricking meaning at this point.

And this comes from a person who was subbed to "CriticalDrinker" for the longest time and only unsubbed like 5-6 months ago when I noticed that he started calling things woke that had nothing to do with what woke actually means. Or how he focused on Marvel at almost every oportunity to say Hollywood is dead when there are plenty of other movies leaving Hollywood, but arent Disney.

I say this with the utmost respect to yall cause we are all here as Indiana Jones Fans: Chill out, take a breather, go outside for a bit and stop binging anything that is online content. As in, social media, youtube, twitch, etc. What I noticed before my own break is that the more I had done it myself, the more I ended up thinking its worse than it was. Is there a problem we should address? Yes. Is it a catastrophe or world ending disaster or one that may throw society in a new era? No.

You would think that at this point in time, every country in the world would turn more and more woke, by the literal sense of the word but meanwhile in germany (where I live) the Nazis are on the rise again through a new party and they grow every day with more and more supporters.

I love yall, but there is more important stuff happening in the world than dumb gamedevs saying dumb stuff about your favorite franchise. And I say this as a person who loves the franchise. Yes even Crystalskull, suck my ass. :lilimjoy:
IndyBender Feb 8, 2024 @ 5:24am 
Originally posted by Vi-El:
Originally posted by IndyBender:
I'd be more skeptical about aspects of actual gameplay, but that's just me.

This. So much this. I have seen the trailer and for the gameplay? I must admit the game looks fricking boring. From a literal standpoint of this being an Indiana Jones game, I cannot think of Indi as being a FPS type Protagonist. Not that he cant shoot a gun or use his whip proper. Hell hes a pretty good fighter overall, no shade whatsoever.

But the trailer shows pre-game (more than likely) footage of a combat system that looks more than lackluster and boring to play with enemies who could shoot you at any moment but wont cause Indi's gotta whip.
I personally think it looks pretty fun, using the whip could be really interesting and creative, but what I'm concerned about regarding it is that it can easily be messed up and potentially hold the game back. It's the same thing with melee-centric combat, it could easily have some flaws that hold it back, which is likely why most games that have fist-based combat systems seem to go for third-person (to my knowledge) or don't use fists as the primary method in general. I thought that it looked pretty good right now but we need to see more from them first before passing judgement.

Originally posted by Vi-El:
Considering that Todd Howard is the Executive Producer on the game, this specifically has me more than worried. And hell, if the doomsayers in this thread end up being correct, it just adds to it. But as for the game itself? Everyone but IndyBender needs to stop with the doomposting. Woke here, Woke there, the word lost its fricking meaning at this point.
I will say that Todd has been behind some less-than-stellar games since Skyrim/Fallout 4 (for some, I've never played either so I'm not the end-all-be-all on that) but he has been shown to be a serious Indiana Jones fan throughout this process so I'm willing to give him a little leeway for having his name in the Raiders opening credits font in the trailer. (Personally I think that having the word lose its meaning is kind of the point but that's not important here)

Originally posted by Vi-El:
You would think that at this point in time, every country in the world would turn more and more woke, by the literal sense of the word but meanwhile in germany (where I live) the Nazis are on the rise again through a new party and they grow every day with more and more supporters.

I love yall, but there is more important stuff happening in the world than dumb gamedevs saying dumb stuff about your favorite franchise.
Ah, greetings from across the pond, my man! Sucks to hear about those yokels, though, I hope things get better, seems to be happening to a fair few countries. Stay safe out there, chief.

Originally posted by Vi-El:
And I say this as a person who loves the franchise. Yes even Crystalskull, suck my ass. :lilimjoy:
Heck yeah, man, I'm not gonna say that the new ones aren't without flaws entirely but I still enjoy them regardless, the music especially.
OneDeadLombax (Banned) Feb 15, 2024 @ 10:31pm 
Indiana Jones was always woke; just nonstop "nazis bad"

You really should have expected this
blurryface Feb 16, 2024 @ 1:28pm 
Originally posted by IndyBender:
I definitely agree with you that casting judgement NOW is not the way to go. I would say that it is at least better to wait and see what else is shown about the game, since it's releasing this year and therefore we should (hopefully) be seeing a fair bit more soon. If someone's gonna be skeptical about the game, then okay, I don't expect to change your mind a whole lot. Personally, I'd be more skeptical about aspects of actual gameplay, but that's just me.

Why was it okay to criticize Sonic's design for the Sonic movie before the movie was released, but it isn't okay to criticize a video game made under the supervision of Disney who are known for their unlikable strong female characters and the insertion of "the message" all over their projects?

Indiana Jones is all about the story and I'm personally concerned about that, because I don’t want another Helena Shaw (an unlikable and patronizing female character), and we’ve already had a Marion (a likable female sidekick), so there is no need for another copycat of her. I simply don’t want Gina to be more of the same crap that has ruined new Disney’s movies and shows for me.

In my opinion, it’s perfectly fine to criticize this new video game, especially because we are not in the 90’s anymore where entertainment was more genuine and didn’t try to actively push agendas. Now Disney owns Lucasfilm, and the last game from MachineGames was a mess story wise, so let people be concerned about the franchise they love and care about, because we don’t want Indiana Jones to be ruined like Star Wars was. It doesn’t matter how much of a fan that Senior Narrative Director guy is, he doesn’t look like someone who would tell a “clean” story without forcing certain things or lines of dialogue to push for more of the useless nonsense, not everyone is into this woke ideology, but I’m definitely into great games that don’t force crap ideologies down my throat and instead focus on telling a good story.
< >
Showing 46-60 of 92 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Jan 20, 2024 @ 10:18pm
Posts: 92