Will TES6 be UE5?

[𝑲]

Many men were saying that the graphics in Starfield were outdated on release.

Maybe Bethesda listened and used this as a test to graft UE5 onto the Creation engine.

Existing work done is not impeded, consumers can precompile the modern graphics, and the next generation of GPUs can fly off the shelves.

Would you be happy with that, or do you prefer upgraded Creation engine?

[Seferoth]

Bethesda should make a completely new engine from scratch. They have used the same engine since Morrowind...MORROWIND!!!

[minisith]

Originally posted by Seferoth:

Bethesda should make a completely new engine from scratch. They have used the same engine since Morrowind...MORROWIND!!!

The update the Creation engine just like every other game Studio does.

[★REM★]

i surely hope so, but considering it's on the works since couple years, it's probably Gamebryo

[kdodds]

After this? I'm not sure. I certainly hope not. CE2 looks just fine, so there's no need to insert a UE renderer.

[Rhym3z]

I hope not. Its been the pain in the side for almost every game thats used it.

[Nogger Sandwich]

Hopefully not. They should've redo their creation engine or even make creation engine 2.0

[Myztkl©-Kev]

it's not, it will still be the same ♥♥♥♥♥♥ gamebryo/creation engine where there will be a load screen for every building you enter. This game doesn't even run on UE5, it's still gamebryo, with just the renderer being UE5

[FhqwhTODD]

Originally posted by kdodds:

After this? I'm not sure. I certainly hope not. CE2 looks just fine, so there's no need to insert a UE renderer.

Please. For the love of god. Get some glasses.

[Hex]

UE5 doesn't do what Bethesda needs it to do, at all, so they have 3 options,

A) Keep updating and using the horrendously outdated trashcan of an engine they have.

B) Make a new engine, which takes so much money and time that I doubt they will bother.

OR C) Swap to UE5 and completely change the base design of their games.

[Punished Todd]

They should use CryEngine like Warhorse did. CryEngine has shown it can do everything Creation does with NPC schedules etc., other than object placement being persistent.

[Myztkl©-Kev]

Originally posted by Hex:

UE5 doesn't do what Bethesda needs it to do, at all, so they have 2 options,

A) Keep updating and using the horrendously outdated trashcan of an engine they have.

B) Make a new engine, which takes so much money and time that I doubt they will bother.

OR C) Swap to UE5 and completely change the base design of their games.

Todd's already said they like their tools and their engine, and honestly it's fine for this type of game that takes place on 1 world map, it's terrible for a game like starfield.

[Deviant]

there wont be TES6 period their teaser was 7 years ago! 7!!!! and we havent seen anything since you really think they are actually developing it? they arent you can expect half life 3 faster than TES6

[Mightylink]

I doubt it, this was a very special circumstance where Virtuous was able to use it to quickly get it released, creating a new game from scratch in Unreal Engine will be a lot harder.

We might see it again for the Fallout 3 Remaster but I'm sure Bethesda themselves is going to stick to the Creation Engine for Elder Scrolls 6.

[Hex]

Originally posted by Myztkl©-Kev:

Originally posted by Hex:

UE5 doesn't do what Bethesda needs it to do, at all, so they have 2 options,

A) Keep updating and using the horrendously outdated trashcan of an engine they have.

B) Make a new engine, which takes so much money and time that I doubt they will bother.

OR C) Swap to UE5 and completely change the base design of their games.

Todd's already said they like their tools and their engine, and honestly it's fine for this type of game that takes place on 1 world map, it's terrible for a game like starfield.

Starfield being terrible had nothing to do with the engine, it was just a boring game.