Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
You also say they violated Steam EA and don't say how.
None so far. Therefore, no violation.
VR... Always advertised as post-release. Even in the kickstarter.
Bandits... Only advertised as an upcoming feature. Still being worked on. Still being planned. Coming to a build near you.
Water... For years they have stated this system would be one of the last to be touched.
So what specific promises exactly are you ranting about?
Sounds like you have more nonsense than sense. No offense.
Did you actually read the Steam EA rules?
Rules:
2. Do not make specific promises about future events. For example, there is no way you can know exactly when the game will be finished, that the game will be finished, or that planned future additions will definitely happen. Do not ask your customers to bet on the future of your game. Customers should be buying your game based on its current state, not on promises of a future that may or may not be realized.
===
The interesting thing to note here is that TFP have not explicitly promised the things you mentioned.
They have stated that 'Bandits are still planned'; But did not say 'Bandits will definitely be in the game eventually.'; But they've put in a lot of effort to refine the pathing AI explicitly to suit bandits who should be more intelligent than their braindead counterparts.
They have stated that fixing up the water is something they'd like to do in the future- But not 'We'll definitely fix the water in Alpha 22' or any variation thereof; They're actually in the process of fixing water with A21 though, so... (And as Sylen said above, It's been the last thing on the priority list for awhile- They never explicitly promised it. They just never stopped mentioning it since people keep asking about it.)
Same with VR- The plan is to get VR going, but not until post-release. They have not explicitly promised that they would definitely do VR at XYZ date. Further, This is the one thing among the three that it doesn't really matter if they promise it at this point- VR has already been planned and promised since the kickstarter that preceded the games entry into Early Access- The promise was made BEFORE entering early access, and is thereby not subject to the early access rule.
The Early Access rule against specific promises is pretty specifically about stating dates such as the exact time the game will be finished, or when or even if a specific feature will be implemented 100% for sure- But more specifically, the rule is to avoid convincing customers to buy on 'what will be'. TFP have never gone out of their way to push sales of the game based on what will come in the future; So I doubt the application of the rule would stand.
And lastly, "We would like to..." "Or the current plan is...but that might change", etc, etc is NOT an explicit promise. Otherwise the holy Road Map that everyone begs for constantly wouldn't be allowable, as under that interpretation, by listing out future expectations/plans/goals they're explicitly promising them and thereby breaking early access rules. Which would be dumb, and you know it.
That is literally just common developer sense. What argument are you talking about, and how the hell are you trying to turn this nonsense into a violation?
Other users and people in the know on game development ABC's have stated that it's incredibly stupid to spend all your time optimizing and bugfixing before adding everything in- It's a waste of time since you will inevitably break a bunch of your work when you add more things in that case. But Users were never asked or incentivized to 'bet' on the game being finished by TFP.
The whole point of Kickstarter is to outline what you would like for the future- Functionally making promises of what would be done with the money received from kickstarting, all in order to secure funding to begin on the journey of whatever thing your kickstarter is for.
But Kickstarter is NOT Steam's Early Access program. It's a completely different process owned by a different company with rules of it's own.
Like, What even are you trying to accomplish with this incredibly wrong statement? You're trying to twist facts so hard that you got yourself confused somewhere in the middle.
But then you didn't bother to share with the class all this evidence you found to prove your stance? Not even a single link per topic (Bandits/water/VR)?
Citations needed.