How is this game still so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ugly and janky after 10 years?

[Kayleigh]

Compared to games like DayZ and Scum, this game is an absolute eyesore..What kind of excuse can there be after 10 years in alpha??

[Fetus_Feaster]

I can tell you only play games with high graphics. It's like saying super mario 64 isn't a good game, because it doesn't have good graphics, and I don't wanna hear tHat'S FrOm 1995 tHOugh, just because it's old, doesn't mean it's good

[Hades]

Publicado originalmente por Fetus_Muncher:

I can tell you only play games with high graphics. It's like saying super mario 64 isn't a good game, because it doesn't have good graphics, and I don't wanna hear tHat'S FrOm 1995 tHOugh, just because it's old, doesn't mean it's good

Yeah but playing super mario 64 in 1440p with dynamic shadows, bloom and photo realistic textures in a procedually-generated world with destructable terrain would be fully sick!

[Dufflebags]

I guarantee statistically players play 7daystoday for WAAAAAY more hours than they ever touch those two forgotten PUGs.

[Hades]

Publicado originalmente por Dufflebags:

I guarantee statistically players play 7daystoday for WAAAAAY more hours than they ever touch those two forgotten PUGs.

Truth. :)

[Appa]

Publicado originalmente por Kayleigh:

Compared to games like DayZ and Scum, this game is an absolute eyesore..What kind of excuse can there be after 10 years in alpha??

7 days may not look the best because you have it on low graphic options?? Again, DayZ is boring. Rather a game look 'bad' and be super fun then look good and be boring after the first 5 hours. but you should try the shut the ♥♥♥♥ up challenge.

[BORG]

Publicado originalmente por Kayleigh:

Publicado originalmente por SylenThunder:

OP also needs to learn the difference between a Voxel game, and all the other games he plays.[community.7daystodie.com]

She*

thanks

Well, this is where I begin to lose hope that the discussion can be taken seriously.

Publicado originalmente por Kayleigh:

Publicado originalmente por baddoggs:

Ok, i have +1500 hrs in 7DtD, +1500 hrs in DayZ and 700+ hrs in Scum.
I have to say, op, have you even played any of these games for like more
than 5 min... I seriously doubt it if you think they are "the same".
7 Days is a survival game, pure and simple, DayZ is a shooter with survival
elements and Scum? At this stage of development i don't think Scum
knows what it is yet...But, it is NOT a voxel based survival game..

Ok after a quick bit of research, out of the couple of dozen "survival"
games you have on account only 2 are past 100 hrs, Just survive with 136hrs
and the Forrest with 111hrs.
7Dtd you have 0 hrs on account, The games you quoted, DayZ, 38 hrs
and Scum 50hrs...
In summery, pretty clear you know NOTHING about survival games in
general and very little if anything about the games you quoted...
My advice, shut up NOW, you already look stupid enough...

@Androth, DayZ looks fine to me, like it just the way it is... Apart
from the flying cars that is...

@Trooper Bri, You want that roast med, or well done...

Nah i'm good fam

What do I see? Entitlement with no appreciation what so ever. even after you stated you played the game 'extensively'. Are you playing for graphics or are you playing for the enjoyment of the game's mechanics and properties that make it fun and unique? From what I see, you're putting graphics quantity ahead of game quality.

You got to play the game for free on your boyfriend's account, didn't spend a dime on it and you come here to basically shame the game and the company for not doing what you expect, fast enough. That's pretty petty and unfair.

Kayleigh, if you were good, fam, why did you come here and complain about the appearance of the game in the first place? it surely doesn't look like it was to share a fair opinion or view of the game. It's bias on every level. Was it your aim to shame The Fun Pimps and get people on board with you to shame the company and their work? If so, that's not very nice. I could understand if this company had blatantly ripped people off, led and cheated their way to success, but that is simply not the case. The Fun Pimps have done none of that.

The art style of the game isn't intended to be like the art styles of other games. You shouldn't condemn someone else's art style just because it doesn't appeal to you. There are lots of people out there that like the look of this game. The appearance of the game graphically has also changed monumentally over the past five years alone. From alpha 16 to alpha 19 even, the changes have been substantial. Perhaps you should look through the history of the game to see what it used to look like in contrast to what it looks like now, to grasp how much has actually changed, graphically.

As far as the game being clunky goes, sure it's got its burps, clunks and bumps, but the reality is they're not things that are game destroyers. I mean it's still in alpha and it runs like a pretty decent beta game. What more could you possibly ask for or want?

If a bit of clunky game behaviour and graphics aren't fitting your taste that's fine. Having an opinion is fine. However, coming to a message board saying what you have without any credible examples to back your statements isn't gonna earn you much community respect.

[baddoggs]

@Borg, good to see you mate.

[Ripflex]

Publicado originalmente por SylenThunder:

Publicado originalmente por Kayleigh:

I have to admit, I was blissfully unaware of the whole voxel system, but you're right, Valheim is setting a new standard for this kinda game.

Valheim might use a voxel system for the building parts, but that's pretty much the extent of it. They aren't setting any standards at all. It's closer to the non-voxel systems like you see in Ark and Conan.

Space Engineers and Empyrion use Voxels for pretty much everything except the terrain. They also don't have SI calculated in the same way, so there is a lot less system overhead with those.

It's true, Valheim uses more of a limited voxel system to shape and level terrain I think.

And to Kayleigh, The Fun Pimps could gone the Unreal Engine and make the game like ARK but added the Voxel plugin to manipulate terrain and have graphic fidelity and a little bit of "fake" mining and terrain changing... but we wouldn't be able to blow up and destroy stuff and buildings. So there's a give and take here. :/

[SylenThunder]

Publicado originalmente por Ripflex:

Publicado originalmente por SylenThunder:

Valheim might use a voxel system for the building parts, but that's pretty much the extent of it. They aren't setting any standards at all. It's closer to the non-voxel systems like you see in Ark and Conan.

Space Engineers and Empyrion use Voxels for pretty much everything except the terrain. They also don't have SI calculated in the same way, so there is a lot less system overhead with those.

It's true, Valheim uses more of a limited voxel system to shape and level terrain I think.

And to Kayleigh, The Fun Pimps could gone the Unreal Engine and make the game like ARK but added the Voxel plugin to manipulate terrain and have graphic fidelity and a little bit of "fake" mining and terrain changing... but we wouldn't be able to blow up and destroy stuff and buildings. So there's a give and take here. :/

Well technically they couldn't have. The Voxel plugin for UE4 didn't exist until after this title had been in development for several years. There is a good reason TFP chose Unity. At the time there was literally no other engine capable of doing what Unity does, and even now the other contenders aren't nearly as good.

[BORG]

Publicado originalmente por baddoggs:

@Borg, good to see you mate.

[Kayleigh]

Publicado originalmente por Alduincat:

Publicado originalmente por Kayleigh:

Compared to games like DayZ and Scum, this game is an absolute eyesore..What kind of excuse can there be after 10 years in alpha??

7 days may not look the best because you have it on low graphic options?? Again, DayZ is boring. Rather a game look 'bad' and be super fun then look good and be boring after the first 5 hours. but you should try the shut the ♥♥♥♥ up challenge.

You should take your own advice :3

[Kayleigh]

Publicado originalmente por Fetus_Muncher:

I can tell you only play games with high graphics. It's like saying super mario 64 isn't a good game, because it doesn't have good graphics, and I don't wanna hear tHat'S FrOm 1995 tHOugh, just because it's old, doesn't mean it's good

You kidding? Valheim is one of my favorite new games and it looks like ♥♥♥♥.

[Kayleigh]

Publicado originalmente por BORG:

Publicado originalmente por Kayleigh:

She*

thanks

Well, this is where I begin to lose hope that the discussion can be taken seriously.

Publicado originalmente por Kayleigh:

Nah i'm good fam

What do I see? Entitlement with no appreciation what so ever. even after you stated you played the game 'extensively'. Are you playing for graphics or are you playing for the enjoyment of the game's mechanics and properties that make it fun and unique? From what I see, you're putting graphics quantity ahead of game quality.

You got to play the game for free on your boyfriend's account, didn't spend a dime on it and you come here to basically shame the game and the company for not doing what you expect, fast enough. That's pretty petty and unfair.

Kayleigh, if you were good, fam, why did you come here and complain about the appearance of the game in the first place? it surely doesn't look like it was to share a fair opinion or view of the game. It's bias on every level. Was it your aim to shame The Fun Pimps and get people on board with you to shame the company and their work? If so, that's not very nice. I could understand if this company had blatantly ripped people off, led and cheated their way to success, but that is simply not the case. The Fun Pimps have done none of that.

The art style of the game isn't intended to be like the art styles of other games. You shouldn't condemn someone else's art style just because it doesn't appeal to you. There are lots of people out there that like the look of this game. The appearance of the game graphically has also changed monumentally over the past five years alone. From alpha 16 to alpha 19 even, the changes have been substantial. Perhaps you should look through the history of the game to see what it used to look like in contrast to what it looks like now, to grasp how much has actually changed, graphically.

As far as the game being clunky goes, sure it's got its burps, clunks and bumps, but the reality is they're not things that are game destroyers. I mean it's still in alpha and it runs like a pretty decent beta game. What more could you possibly ask for or want?

If a bit of clunky game behaviour and graphics aren't fitting your taste that's fine. Having an opinion is fine. However, coming to a message board saying what you have without any credible examples to back your statements isn't gonna earn you much community respect.

That's a fair response, though I did buy the game on my own account after.

[MisterSpock]

voxel game maybe?

[Tame]

Publicado originalmente por Kayleigh:

Compared to games like DayZ and Scum, this game is an absolute eyesore..What kind of excuse can there be after 10 years in alpha??

Says a lot about you that you only see makeup and not substance.