安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
http://store.steampowered.com/app/107104/
This isn't even half the truth most people couldn't even tell the difference if given a blind test.
Outside of that it fully depends on how the music was recording and the fact is lots of stuff isn't recorded in a way there would be a difference.
And yes, I knew a guy who put all his MP3s down to 64 kbit. He burned them on a CD and had a discman that was able to play MP3 files as well. He said if he does that he gets tons of hours of music on a single CD. I pointed out that MP3s with that low bitrate will have a lower sample rate as well resulting in a very poor quality. He laughed and told me "Well, what's the matter with sound quality, it's punk music anyway."
...and now I feel old. Thank's guys. :/
See, I wrote out a whole argument supporting .flac, but I threw it all away. Why? Because the above says it all better. Regardless of if some people can hear the difference or not, lossless is just that - lossless - and for those whose priority is above all sound quality, it is just fundamentally better than lossy (MP3), which is known to discard data to reduce file-size.
Which is why I want lossless for the Transistor soundtrack. From the snippets I've heard, it sounds fantastic - lush and glossy - and to just have MP3s of it? Urgh. It's like having MP3s of Mozart or Beethoven. Sure, it's possible, but why would you?
You and me both. :(
http://www.xiph.org/video/vid2.shtml
I don't know about FLAC being offered through Steam but they are offering it through their own site and it's the same price there, it's also 15 bucks for the CD there too if you want to go that route.
Clearly some people just can't hear the pureity of flac, those people are fine with MP3, even though MP3 sounds bad.
imo 320kbps MP3s can sound pretty great, and are probably good enough for my hearing/system. But I certainly like having FLAC available, if only for future listening on better equipment maybe.
You can actually get a physical CD on their website, too.
*Raises hand*
I'm in no way an audiophile. I've even lost part of my hearing range due to age and extensive firearms use as a youngster. But even I can see why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crust.
The loss is noticable on a decent stereo setup, too. It's just that a lot of folks don't care. Youtube is the new HD. Though to be fair modern encoding is getting really good... hardly anything less than what was already lost in digital to begin with. It's nowhere near as bad as MP3s from years ago.
I'll be getting the CD off the SuperGiant store.