Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
When do we think this will be implemented?
Also, when will the next CCL begin?
Next CCL will be next week some time.
They are overpriced by design to encourage team growth. LRB6 actually suggests not allowing certain inducements in playoffs at all. In this case we are allowing all inducements and expecting the underdog to choose judiciously.
As for "clear advantage", that depends on the difference. If the teams are within 30TV of each other then the underdog may become the overdog.
But ok, yes I agree, seems fair;]
Personally I dont think any money you spend should effect the the other players inducements,it should be decided before any money is added.
The star players are absolutely overpriced, as is the wizard. They are overpriced because you have choice. Having an extra apothecary when you meet a kill team or a tackle player only against dodge heavy teams is better than having those things permanently on the roster. Therefore you pay a little more.
Fairly certain it hasn't, as I've plenty of teams on fumbbl with a tonne of cash as when I started playing there there wasn't any restriction on the amount of cash you could save up, and that was only 2008.