Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
When do we think this will be implemented?
Also, when will the next CCL begin?
Next CCL will be next week some time.
They are overpriced by design to encourage team growth. LRB6 actually suggests not allowing certain inducements in playoffs at all. In this case we are allowing all inducements and expecting the underdog to choose judiciously.
As for "clear advantage", that depends on the difference. If the teams are within 30TV of each other then the underdog may become the overdog.
But ok, yes I agree, seems fair;]
Personally I dont think any money you spend should effect the the other players inducements,it should be decided before any money is added.
The star players are absolutely overpriced, as is the wizard. They are overpriced because you have choice. Having an extra apothecary when you meet a kill team or a tackle player only against dodge heavy teams is better than having those things permanently on the roster. Therefore you pay a little more.
Fairly certain it hasn't, as I've plenty of teams on fumbbl with a tonne of cash as when I started playing there there wasn't any restriction on the amount of cash you could save up, and that was only 2008.