Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
How are they better? By having slower rotation? By Type 61/ST-A3 having half as much reverse speed? Maybe it's because they have 1 less crew? By having less vertical guidance?
No seriously, how? ST-A3 has an autoloader, sure, but that's it. And don't put armour in quotation marks. You want to be penetrated by e.g. Wiesel from the front in your turret ring? Be my guest, I'll gladly take your armour for whatever you think is OP about these tanks.
Type 75 SPH has a taller profile and the driver isn't protected frontally by the spall liner, top speed is 10 km/h lower. It also has a smaller barrel which leads to a slower round (unless you unlock and choose Type 75 which has 3kg less filler). Oh and it also is at 6.7 in AB for no particular reason, so here you go.
It's also interesting that you mention M46, but not M26 which is, by the way, in a very powerful 6.7 USA lineup. But hey, I mean if Japan doesn't suffer, then maybe you'd prefer to have Type 60 ATM instead of M50? Just so there's balance in the universe? Maybe also trade the Kikka for the F-84?