引用自 SteelWolf45：

引用自 shadain597：

Devil's advocate here, just because you haven't seen the censorship doesn't mean it didn't happen. I've personally been warned on Steam that I needed to edit a post or they would have to take action, and the reason wasn't because I was using foul language or insults, but because it was effectively recommending to someone that they avoid spending money on the game. Though, in the interests of full disclosure, they let the edited version, talking about what **I** would/would not do, toe the line without further comment.

As much as it might not be right, I can sort of understand them not wanting someone to tell people (on their own forum no less) to not spend money on their own game. As you said, it tells me something that they didn't just delete and gave you an option, I feel like I have heard of worse on other games, but I don't remember which ones (not this one, and it's hearsay I don't even remember).

Just because you've heard of worse doesn't make it okay. And while I can absolutely understand why they wouldn't be thrilled by such comments, censorship of opinions regarding the game and it's value goes far beyond the basics of keeping the peace on the forums.

And it's one thing to see that on their own, official forums, but a bit disturbing that it is openly their policy on Steam's forums--Valve is an American company, not Chinese or Russian, so I'm extremely disappointed that they are cool with that. Disappointed, but not too surprised; not only would it be easier to let game companies run wild on the forums, in this case it probably helps their bottom line.

引用自 shadain597：

引用自 SteelWolf45：

As much as it might not be right, I can sort of understand them not wanting someone to tell people (on their own forum no less) to not spend money on their own game. As you said, it tells me something that they didn't just delete and gave you an option, I feel like I have heard of worse on other games, but I don't remember which ones (not this one, and it's hearsay I don't even remember).

Just because you've heard of worse doesn't make it okay. And while I can absolutely understand why they wouldn't be thrilled by such comments, censorship of opinions regarding the game and it's value goes far beyond the basics of keeping the peace on the forums.

And it's one thing to see that on their own, official forums, but a bit disturbing that it is openly their policy on Steam's forums--Valve is an American company, not Chinese or Russian, so I'm extremely disappointed that they are cool with that. Disappointed, but not too surprised; not only would it be easier to let game companies run wild on the forums, in this case it probably helps their bottom line.

Agreed with you on that, none the less... I took a part in throwing this way off topic. Ugh.
(I do look forward to the Israeli tree, I'll probably preemptively grind the aircraft tree before we get the ground tree, which I don't see why it wouldn't happen. Whether I get one of the planes for grinding/early access REALLY depends on whether it fits in the budget really, money's low and self employed work is fun until it dies die rapidly).

引用自 Leplivo：

Yugoslavia would have been a much more better tech tree even though it has copy paste vehicles this tree doesn't just copy paste vehicles it also lacks vehicles. Gaijin listening to the community 10/10.

id think Hungary and Romania would be better! Plus they had their own designs, and could both have axis,and Comintern tanks(Comintern would be for late tree).

引用自 Zapp：

引用自 Leplivo：

Yugoslavia would have been a much more better tech tree even though it has copy paste vehicles this tree doesn't just copy paste vehicles it also lacks vehicles. Gaijin listening to the community 10/10.

id think Hungary and Romania would be better! Plus they had their own designs, and could both have axis,and Comintern tanks(Comintern would be for late tree).

After Israel is fully added, I wouldn't mind seeing Brazil added. I have heard that Brazil has some interesting vehicles that could be added, I have seen a mock up tech tree or 2 of what it's ground forces could look like.

引用自 SteelWolf45：

I do look forward to the Israeli tree, I'll probably preemptively grind the aircraft tree before we get the ground tree, which I don't see why it wouldn't happen. Whether I get one of the planes for grinding/early access REALLY depends on whether it fits in the budget really, money's low and self employed work is fun until it dies die rapidly.

Yes, on topic, I'm very curious to see how starting in rank 4 is going to work for the tree. Having a premium to grind it probably isn't critical, especially in air, but I do personally love Spitfires, and having a (theoretically) functional CAS loadout on one sounds quite interesting.

IDK about Ground, but at least in Air RB it is maddening to be in a turnfighter twiddling your thumbs late match because the last enemy is hiding by the airfield and you can't even effectively target the remaining AIs in the middle of the map. All your buddies are shooting down the soft targets before you get to them and the tanks and pillboxes love to shrug off low-caliber rounds, and going back to base to pick up something like 2 x 50kg bombs is just sad.

引用自 shadain597：

引用自 SteelWolf45：

I do look forward to the Israeli tree, I'll probably preemptively grind the aircraft tree before we get the ground tree, which I don't see why it wouldn't happen. Whether I get one of the planes for grinding/early access REALLY depends on whether it fits in the budget really, money's low and self employed work is fun until it dies die rapidly.

Yes, on topic, I'm very curious to see how starting in rank 4 is going to work for the tree. Having a premium to grind it probably isn't critical, especially in air, but I do personally love Spitfires, and having a (theoretically) functional CAS loadout on one sounds quite interesting.

IDK about Ground, but at least in Air RB it is maddening to be in a turnfighter twiddling your thumbs late match because the last enemy is hiding by the airfield and you can't even effectively target the remaining AIs in the middle of the map. All your buddies are shooting down the soft targets before you get to them and the tanks and pillboxes love to shrug off low-caliber rounds, and going back to base to pick up something like 2 x 50kg bombs is just sad.

Agreed, personally I look forward to the ground vehicles, I think they will be fun to play.

Hell yeah!!

How about Yugoslavia or Iran?

Ah yes, Americas greatest ally. Goyim better be pay to win!

Is the USS Liberty in game for practice with the Israeli airforce?

shalom

scotland here @devs can we get our flag back not behind a paywall?

引用自 ForsakenSco：

scotland here @devs can we get our flag back not behind a paywall?

I thought all nations flags were behind a paywall.

引用自 ForsakenSco：

scotland here @devs can we get our flag back not behind a paywall?

They were free at one point, they were put behind a paywall because the playerbase started grossly misusing the flags in conjunction with other decals to express hatred and discontent.

While I wont speak on behalf of the developers, I think the short answer is "No" simply because there are many things going on right now (Real world & WT) that would cause users to be tempted to misuse the decals in similar ways that caused the decals to be removed in the first place.

引用自 Blitzkrieg Wulf：

引用自 ForsakenSco：

scotland here @devs can we get our flag back not behind a paywall?

They were free at one point, they were put behind a paywall because the playerbase started grossly misusing the flags in conjunction with other decals to express hatred and discontent.

While I wont speak on behalf of the developers, I think the short answer is "No" simply because there are many things going on right now (Real world & WT) that would cause users to be tempted to misuse the decals in similar ways that caused the decals to be removed in the first place.

They already can (to my knowledge) offers certain things to players based on location if I am not mistaken, why not let someone have 1 or 2 of the flags that are in or near their region? That would solve both issues I would think. (For example, someone in the US/NA region could grab either the USA flag, Mexican Flag, or Canadian flag, one or two of those for free.) Or even more simply, make it to where the only flag they can get is the on that is for their country. Oh well, none the less.