unerpowered, in fact a lot of them are some of the toughest and most intimidating tanks in the game. Basically every tiger tank, the Jagtiger, the Maus, etc etc are all very, very good.

Not all British tanks
OP tanks- and then you hit tier 5 and it's back downhill again. [/quote]

And not all Russians are OP either, so if a T44 kills you in AB at that Br, especially if your 7.7, thats skill, worst tank

;1729837292641362119]The XM-1 isn't op. If it was "op" than why does it have some of the worst stats in the game?
You people just suck. [/quote]
Because all the noobs buy the tank, rush, die, then spawn in a helicopter
; only beat by the Type 90 by .5 and the Leopard 2k by 1.5.
-83km/h, the Ru-251 is 80 km/h and the Sd.Kfz 234/2 (Puma) is 90km/h, the Ru being previously the fastest tank in the game and the Puma being an

5 tanks are among the worst in war thunder.
8.Yay. More conspiracy.
9.Broken game mechanics. Does not only benefit Russian tanks.

Have you played Russian tier 5 tanks like IS-3?
Also Russian tier 5

the excuse that there were a TON of people completely new to the game hoping into a tank that was effectively 11.0 material (which was the end game BR at the time, the 2PL started at 10.7), but today
instead of the tech tree players, which is to say the better or luckier players are driving those instead of the tech tree stuff which is pretty sad as it defeats the point of even having M1A2's in the game

seems any team that has russian tanks, is garanteed to win. I really like this game, but i don't know how much longer i can stand what seems to be russian bias.
Do any of you guys have thoughts on this
blows on first hit... [/quote]

I seriously thing you have a Learn-To-Play problem here buds. Russian tanks suck. They have the worst reserves, and 'till you get the IS-2 you'll get owned. T-34's are easy

easy mode. Which is game developer bias, not the players.

Are you really so silly to go against all statistics with your lies? [/quote]

What I'm getting at is that they're not accurate enough to back
but in a way they are because their planes simply cannot be used wrong. So they are the most noob friendly in the game. USA planes are the opposite, one tiny mistake and you are dead and that's not a

historical lineup in an ARCADE game, people either often want semi-balanced realism or truly balanced fast gameplay - yet World War mode combined the worst of two worlds, fighting T-34s in Pz III Es can be fun
you want only what you want.

Play world war mode, you will see just how good the game is when it is what you want.
they have to bribe us with vehicles to play it. [/quote]


I tried World War mode, it

by any tank with 100ish pen.

Ammo, keeping in mind the Abrams had depleted uranium rounds. But they don't want to put that in the game so what do they do, give the Abrams the crappiest round. The
pen

So a tank that had depleted uranium rounds that could slice through anything starts and ends with the worst round.

doesn't make sense. [/quote]
Grade A example right here, US fanboy, right here

to be riased so they can fix it, or the game has some bugs, idk.[/quote]
Statcards don't tell the whole truth at best and outright lie at worst. The RISE's side turret armor is cast and varies its
understand that not all ERA are equal, but i look at the info provided in the game, the numbers and digits punched in by the Gaijin themselves.
either they inserted incorrect numbers in, which is a good point

either battle rating drops, improved flight models, or both. Right now the P-38 is one of my favorite in-game aircraft, while the P-47, F6F, and F4U-1d are a great mix of firepower, bombs, armor, speed
, P-47, F4U-1d, and P-40 all fly like the same plane. The F6F is the most maneuverable, the P-40 has the worst roll rate, the F4U and P-47 are less maneuverable but have really powerful engines so they