Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And there's the first mistake. The plane is perfectly capable and it's a great plane for people looking for a nice turnfighter. The only place you get American enemies as Britain is in the Hokkaido exercise I believe and in those rare cases you can just lure them into a turnfight and wear down their energy. The Spitfire does better defensively than offensively in my experience and top tier is a very different meta in supersonic jets rather than early war prop fighters. Speed is certainly important but so is altitude and proper tactics. BF-109s are harder to fly but they have a different playstyle and comparing a Spitfire to a BF-109 is like comparing apples and oranges. Run the engine on auto control at 96% to get your good power and thrust for a lower temperature in the optimal and yellow zones. Flaps aren't needed in the Spitfire because of how well it turns already and they just kill your speed. And last, of course Germany never gets carrier maps. They have no carrier capable planes like the British, Americans, or Japanese do, making them not get carrier maps.
Then tried P47s and complained it could not turn and you could not hit anything with it because of wing mounted guns (6 x 50 cals, like shredding every thing in front of it).
Now you try Spitfires (turners (so not very fast) with not so good armament).
And now you complain that a turner like a Spitfire can't fly so fast and thus can't chase the American planes?
No shít Sherlock!
What's next?
You'll try the Japanese and complain about missing armor and lacking in top speed?
Nothing 2 sea move along.....
i keep falling asleep when i wait for them to come close enough to shoot them.
every time i try to go uphill in them, the pilot fall asleep and fall down again.
why don't they have tracks? much easier to roll on the ground looking for enemies
2. yes
3. because the bf109 is NOT a spitfire and will never be one. excuse yourself for comparing that british crap with a beautiful bf109.
4. yes
5. yes
6. get a bf109 or fw190. it can do that
As I said, km/h is inflated. 767mph is a much easier number to remember considering its only 3 digits for mach 1 rather than 1235 km/h which is a 4 digit number for mach 1. Even though I remember both off the top of my head mph is still much better IMO. The Metric system is French, the Imperial system is British. As America came from Britain we still use miles, feet, yards, and gallons. Why do I need to look at a bigger number rather than a smaller number for measuring speed? Is it because you lack confidence and need bigger numbers to make you feel better? Although sometimes it is bad to have a bigger number for measuring things like height (3 meters tall vs 6'0) Relative Speed does not need a bigger number.