Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The Cent X armor is exactly as expected, the 4202 isn't that well armored on the turret, in combat effectiveness, the majority of bounces will come from peeking over ridges and rounds hitting that turret roof as a result.
But the announcement post advertised it as good turret armour, but it's even worse than the FV4202 which at least had 180-230mm effective protection on the turret ring. I looked at the new centurion and it is terrible. Why did they advertise it at good protection? So it's not really good armour, it's just perhaps you will bounce a roof shot when peeking over hills, but any decent shot that isn't skimming your roof will kill you as the cheek armour aren't going to help you against a tiger 2?