please bring tiger 2 back to 7.0

[dapanda79kmer]

Why is the tiger 2 back at 6.7? we can't play a 5.7 rb battle without this monster. and why is the T-44 100 still 7.0 and not 6.7! this game still can't give good balanced ground rb. all it does best is ride our nerves.

[LordBUM]

mate its never been 7.0 its always been 6.7 and never will be 7.0 and 5.7 being uptiered to 6.7 has nothing to do with the Tiger its fine at 6.7 nothing is gonna change.

[Bugboy921]

At 7.0 Tiger 2 would be going up against helicopters when uptiered.

[Cat]

6.7 is fair br to tiger omg
am even confused why they made the 10.5cm tiger at 7.0 that tank have longer reload and more weak spots

[Ddinosaur]

T29 back to 6.7

[dapanda79kmer]

so is that fair to put tiger 2 in game play again a country whicht can never beat it at 5.7 aka USA? what is the sense in that? none jumbo or sherman can beat it.

[AlextheTower]

Originally posted by dapanda79kmer:

so is that fair to put tiger 2 in game play again a country whicht can never beat it at 5.7 aka USA? what is the sense in that? none jumbo or sherman can beat it.

The Tiger 2 has never been 7.0. (at least in RB)

[Eftwyrd]

Originally posted by dapanda79kmer:

so is that fair to put tiger 2 in game play again a country whicht can never beat it at 5.7 aka USA? what is the sense in that? none jumbo or sherman can beat it.

you expect an average tank to frontally kill a heavy a full br above it and think this is the definition of fair? Some vehicles you need to flank and the US is better equipped than most in that regard

Learn to use what you have to your best advantage and stop focusing on br, your best spaa at 5.7 is still a 2.7 m16 and will be until you get radar. You still have locusts, m18s etc that other nations can only dream of, just because they are lower br doesn’t mean they stopped working

[biomike]

Originally posted by dapanda79kmer:

so is that fair to put tiger 2 in game play again a country whicht can never beat it at 5.7 aka USA? what is the sense in that? none jumbo or sherman can beat it.

If you are uptiered you need to use your brain a bit and not just go head on vs a heavy
For example the APCR for the 76mm can punch right through the front of their turret

[Omega Sirius]

Originally posted by Celestial:

6.7 is fair br to tiger omg
am even confused why they made the 10.5cm tiger at 7.0 that tank have longer reload and more weak spots

It had a bigger gun than the 88mm version. And more weak spots? No.

[Eftwyrd]

Originally posted by Omega Sirius:

Originally posted by Celestial:

6.7 is fair br to tiger omg
am even confused why they made the 10.5cm tiger at 7.0 that tank have longer reload and more weak spots

It had a bigger gun than the 88mm version. And more weak spots? No.

Bigger boom doesn’t really provide any advantage once you have hit the threshold of being able to one shot

So long as one-shotting the target is possible with both, you are not getting meaningfully better penetration and sacrificing rate of fire for it

The only thing it has going for it is an updated transmission from memory, haven’t used the piece of **** for many years so take that as my opinion on how valuable the change really is

[VeeVee]

Originally posted by Eftwyrd:

Originally posted by Omega Sirius:

It had a bigger gun than the 88mm version. And more weak spots? No.

Bigger boom doesn’t really provide any advantage once you have hit the threshold of being able to one shot

So long as one-shotting the target is possible with both, you are not getting meaningfully better penetration and sacrificing rate of fire for it

The only thing it has going for it is an updated transmission from memory, haven’t used the piece of **** for many years so take that as my opinion on how valuable the change really is

Upgraded engine, rangefinder, bigger gun are the differences.

[Ddinosaur]

Originally posted by VeeVee:

Originally posted by Eftwyrd:

Bigger boom doesn’t really provide any advantage once you have hit the threshold of being able to one shot

So long as one-shotting the target is possible with both, you are not getting meaningfully better penetration and sacrificing rate of fire for it

The only thing it has going for it is an updated transmission from memory, haven’t used the piece of **** for many years so take that as my opinion on how valuable the change really is

Upgraded engine, rangefinder, bigger gun are the differences.

And the gun cover around the base of the barrel being bigger, making it harder to go through the cheeks

[Lucky_Star_Fan]

Yeah Tiger II H really ought to go up, or other vehicles should move back down. M26 and the IS-2 in particular really do not belong at the same BR as the IIH.

[Hydra]

Hopefully when they decompress br's more it will actually happen.

[Darugdawg]

go back playing t34