Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
Currently I'm mostly using 2DB free french forces on most tanks (it used to be flags but I don't want to pay for them), except tier 5 russian, where I use GDR markings.
Also a thing that might come in handy in simulator, I have my camouflage condition at 10 percent, it won't fool anybody in AB (mostly..) but the tank actually almost looks as if it's been destroyed already.
Sure, but it make things a lot easier if people would use recognisable markings.
But yeah, it looks like I'll have to preview every tank on both sides and study colors, profiles at various angles and even the flak gun crews' unifroms.
A lot of people seem to feel very strongly that markings are a bad idea; I had no idea that my suggestion would garner so much criticism; even telling me that I should not be playing in Realistic tournaments!
I have played many matches today in the tournament and as far as I know I have not killed any teammates, scoring top in my team on a few occasions; I don't believe that I am as stupid as some here make me out to be.
I still believe clear markings are a good idea.
Lol
You guys must be trolling me.
I never said that markings could be seen at 2 km, just that markings would help to identify friend from foe in many situations; through smoke and dust and explosions, etc.
I never suggested markings should be the main means of identification.
Oh, I would definitely shoot at your Panther, because I'm playing Russians :)
And I will continue to play Realistic competition battles despite your telling me not to.
I don't have a problem with intelligent opinons and intelligent discussion; and I will continue to post topics if I find the subject interesting.
also players use axis emblems on their russian tanks sometimes... and as someone who can identify a tank just by looking at the sprockets, the only advice i can give you is the camoflage colour, green for russian and USA, grey/yellow for germany, the winter camo on russians and germany may cause confusion, but anyone in their right mind wouldn't use a winter camo because there is no winter maps! (please gaijin, please) and i put decals on so my friends can recognise me. silhouttes with some memory should become recognisable.
but people, alas, not everyone can differ a il-2 and a stuka from 1km away... hence me getting shot down by friendly AA and sometimes friendly tanks when i'm playing tanks in sim combined battles...
but now they dropped the tiers of tanks i don't think i'll be playing it much more...
funny story: my friend who shall remain un-named, spawned, saw a KV-1, drove past before getting shot at by it... it was a german prenuim KV-1 who dropped his camo condition so you couldn't tell from the camo, and yet i knew it was a enemy just by looking at the gun...
summary: the camoflages will help identify friendlys from enemys, but there are sometimes where you can't rely on that alone, so some extent of learning is required, but few people like me put decals on their tanks for identification, there is also those people that like to make their tanks completley orange.
Also some markings are not easy to recognise.