BTR´s for russia

[Hamdija]

yes no?

[hsf_]

I'd like to see quite a few of the vehicles that we're currently seeing in active combat. Even though I wouldn't play half of them like the BTR-82, but the SAM systems and the more modernised tanks such as the T-90M and BMP-Terminator would be nice.

[:partyhat:]

BTR-80 with a 14.5mm Kord at BR1.3 soon.

Jk I really hope they don't put more cold war vehicles in low BR.
I suppose they could add a btr-90 with the 30mm and ATGMS to high tier. Not like Russia needs another IFV but it could work.

[Hamdija]

i like wheeled vehicles and would like to see more in russia

[Al3oqab]

Yes

[Col. Cornbread]

We will see them, and then for no reason at all we will see performance increase in wheeled vehicles.

[♠Gamer3106♠]

a btr with 30mm and atgms mmmh yes, bmp2 3.0, I want it

If they ever add the 14.5 mm BTR where do you think it should stay guys? 1.7 or higher?

I'd say 1.7 tbh

[Knugen]

Escrito originalmente por ♠Gamer3106♠:

a btr with 30mm and atgms mmmh yes, bmp2 3.0, I want it

If they ever add the 14.5 mm BTR where do you think it should stay guys? 1.7 or higher?

I'd say 1.7 tbh

♥♥♥♥ no

[Velico]

I'd rather see other nations get some light vehicle love (France, France, France, and France). Russia has had a stacked techtree for ages, and they're statistically the most played nation (save for the zone between 5.0-7.0 because that's the only area Russian vehicles kinda suck). I wouldn't mind them introduced later on, but Russia does not need more damn vehicles in this game right now when every other nation pales in lineup viability.

[flat_Lander1]

Escrito originalmente por ewen.work:

Escrito originalmente por ♠Gamer3106♠:

a btr with 30mm and atgms mmmh yes, bmp2 3.0, I want it

If they ever add the 14.5 mm BTR where do you think it should stay guys? 1.7 or higher?

I'd say 1.7 tbh

♥♥♥♥ no

♥♥♥♥ yes

[♠Gamer3106♠]

Escrito originalmente por ewen.work:

Escrito originalmente por ♠Gamer3106♠:

a btr with 30mm and atgms mmmh yes, bmp2 3.0, I want it

If they ever add the 14.5 mm BTR where do you think it should stay guys? 1.7 or higher?

I'd say 1.7 tbh

♥♥♥♥ no

Why not? 45mm of pen at max and no armour whatsoever

[Knugen]

Escrito originalmente por ♠Gamer3106♠:

Escrito originalmente por ewen.work:

♥♥♥♥ no

Why not? 45mm of pen at max and no armour whatsoever

Yeah sure why not just casually place a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ 1960's armored car against paper tanks

[♠Gamer3106♠]

Escrito originalmente por ewen.work:

Escrito originalmente por ♠Gamer3106♠:

Why not? 45mm of pen at max and no armour whatsoever

Yeah sure why not just casually place a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ 1960's armored car against paper tanks

Which is also made of paper and has relatively low penetration. And the only advantage I can think of is speed

Maybe 2.0 because it has multiple rounds but no higher than that

[Knugen]

dude

Escrito originalmente por ♠Gamer3106♠:

Escrito originalmente por ewen.work:

Yeah sure why not just casually place a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ 1960's armored car against paper tanks

Which is also made of paper and has relatively low penetration. And the only advantage I can think of is speed

Maybe 2.0 because it has multiple rounds but no higher than that

45mm pen is still enough to go through most sides of veichles and even in front in some cases (looking at you germany)

[Knugen]

Besides it would look very out of place

[Futuristic Hexagon]

Best subject of the 1980s car ad ever:
https://youtu.be/zGL_u9j7pjY

Sorry, couldn't resist. The song and way the ad was produced just gave me vibes of an 1980s Ford ad...

Anyways, uparmed variants would be welcomed in the cold war era I'm sure. As long as we don't end up with the situation like when we had the R4 running circles against technology literally 40 years older than it.

While we are at it, let's throw some BDRMs in there too!