TANKS ?

[Pickle Picker Picking Pickles]

Russian T90M has over 170 Hull armour with moderate 125 CANNON,
Seems great, till you realize the earliest Japanese tank hits with a whopping 150-155MM Cannon and your Russian tank is useless, and it's WAY lower tier .
Imagine that .

[Kvakags]

Are you 5 years old?

[Pickle Picker Picking Pickles]

Originally posted by Kvakags:

Are you 5 years old?

Yes 5 years older than you

[Lancebringer]

Originally posted by GODLUCIFER:

Russian T90M has over 170 Hull armour with moderate 125 CANNON,
Seems great, till you realize the earliest Japanese tank hits with a whopping 150-155MM Cannon and your Russian tank is useless, and it's WAY lower tier .
Imagine that .

The Russians only built decent tanks during WW2, we've tested them during the cold war and found them to be severely lacking in any real threat, its why US tank design was still for infantry support, russian tanks werent a real threat. Wasnt until the T-62 came out with the smoothbore APFS-DS round that it was a threat, then we developed the Abrams, which obliterates russian tanks with impunity (we did it during the gulf war, 5 enemy russian tanks obliterated before they could respond by one tank while doing over 50mph).

The T series of autoloader tanks have turned into memes for how far we can send their turrets so easily to the moon. Russians do not design equipment with crew safety in mind.

So take your little tin can and understand that its the most fragile thing ever built and mortar rounds strapped to drones can kill it

[Jager]

Originally posted by Lancebringer:

Originally posted by GODLUCIFER:

Russian T90M has over 170 Hull armour with moderate 125 CANNON,
Seems great, till you realize the earliest Japanese tank hits with a whopping 150-155MM Cannon and your Russian tank is useless, and it's WAY lower tier .
Imagine that .

The Russians only built decent tanks during WW2, we've tested them during the cold war and found them to be severely lacking in any real threat, its why US tank design was still for infantry support, russian tanks werent a real threat. Wasnt until the T-62 came out with the smoothbore APFS-DS round that it was a threat, then we developed the Abrams, which obliterates russian tanks with impunity (we did it during the gulf war, 5 enemy russian tanks obliterated before they could respond by one tank while doing over 50mph).

The T series of autoloader tanks have turned into memes for how far we can send their turrets so easily to the moon. Russians do not design equipment with crew safety in mind.

So take your little tin can and understand that its the most fragile thing ever built and mortar rounds strapped to drones can kill it

you blabing on history this is a game and russian beat everyone stop denying that

[Pickle Picker Picking Pickles]

Originally posted by Jager:

Originally posted by Lancebringer:

The Russians only built decent tanks during WW2, we've tested them during the cold war and found them to be severely lacking in any real threat, its why US tank design was still for infantry support, russian tanks werent a real threat. Wasnt until the T-62 came out with the smoothbore APFS-DS round that it was a threat, then we developed the Abrams, which obliterates russian tanks with impunity (we did it during the gulf war, 5 enemy russian tanks obliterated before they could respond by one tank while doing over 50mph).

The T series of autoloader tanks have turned into memes for how far we can send their turrets so easily to the moon. Russians do not design equipment with crew safety in mind.

So take your little tin can and understand that its the most fragile thing ever built and mortar rounds strapped to drones can kill it

you blabing on history this is a game and russian beat everyone stop denying that

omg becky

[Lancebringer]

Originally posted by Jager:

Originally posted by Lancebringer:

The Russians only built decent tanks during WW2, we've tested them during the cold war and found them to be severely lacking in any real threat, its why US tank design was still for infantry support, russian tanks werent a real threat. Wasnt until the T-62 came out with the smoothbore APFS-DS round that it was a threat, then we developed the Abrams, which obliterates russian tanks with impunity (we did it during the gulf war, 5 enemy russian tanks obliterated before they could respond by one tank while doing over 50mph).

The T series of autoloader tanks have turned into memes for how far we can send their turrets so easily to the moon. Russians do not design equipment with crew safety in mind.

So take your little tin can and understand that its the most fragile thing ever built and mortar rounds strapped to drones can kill it

you blabing on history this is a game and russian beat everyone stop denying that

Ru didnt "Beat everyone"

We stopped at the river, thats the only reason we didnt take berlin.
Russia recently attacked the USA, got their asses handed to them, most died within 20 seconds, and the survivors got a medal for not getting killed.

Russia is losing the war in ukraine, no "winning" nation would rely upon the conscripts and supplies from a third world dictatorship if they were.

They "HAD" some good stuff, all of it blown to oblivion, as I said.

Drop the copium pipe and come back to reality

[Soldner42]

Originally posted by Lancebringer:

Originally posted by Jager:

you blabing on history this is a game and russian beat everyone stop denying that

Ru didnt "Beat everyone"

We stopped at the river, thats the only reason we didnt take berlin.
Russia recently attacked the USA, got their asses handed to them, most died within 20 seconds, and the survivors got a medal for not getting killed.

Russia is losing the war in ukraine, no "winning" nation would rely upon the conscripts and supplies from a third world dictatorship if they were.

They "HAD" some good stuff, all of it blown to oblivion, as I said.

Drop the copium pipe and come back to reality

Bruh, stop it already. Everyone who knows even a little about Vehicles, sees that you have no Idea what your talking about.

[Pickle Picker Picking Pickles]

JAPAN HAS A DUAL CANNON 106MM TYPE 60 TANK ASWELL BEAT THAT .
AND ITS RECOILLESS

[Tankoslav Tepyatdesyatpyatovich]

This thread could easily be nominated for the most pointless and silly thread award so far. Only comment #1 actually makes some sense.

[Pickle Picker Picking Pickles]

Originally posted by Пожилая Юность:

This thread could easily be nominated for the most pointless and silly thread award so far. Only comment #1 actually makes some sense.

reported for trying to rune my career

[j.yellow28]

Originally posted by GODLUCIFER:

Russian T90M has over 170 Hull armour with moderate 125 CANNON,
Seems great, till you realize the earliest Japanese tank hits with a whopping 150-155MM Cannon and your Russian tank is useless, and it's WAY lower tier .
Imagine that .

my 1.0 150mm cannon with tracks says hi? ur point here is what exactly?

I can kill a 100mm gun wwith my 50m gun in a puma.

[Eftwyrd]

Originally posted by Lancebringer:

Originally posted by Jager:

you blabing on history this is a game and russian beat everyone stop denying that

Ru didnt "Beat everyone"

We stopped at the river, thats the only reason we didnt take berlin.
Russia recently attacked the USA, got their asses handed to them, most died within 20 seconds, and the survivors got a medal for not getting killed.

Russia is losing the war in ukraine, no "winning" nation would rely upon the conscripts and supplies from a third world dictatorship if they were.

They "HAD" some good stuff, all of it blown to oblivion, as I said.

Drop the copium pipe and come back to reality

general consensus in ww2 was that Russia would have won the war on their own, it would have just taken a significantly longer time

There were actually serious concerns among the western allies that the red army would not stop and none of them were under any illusions about their ability to hold continental Europe. The US British and French armies did not have the manpower

It’s actually a significant part of the reason they decided to use the atomic bombs rather than go ahead with amphibious landings of the Japanese home islands. Apart from the evaluation that it would cause fewer casualties it was also a warning to Russia who didn’t yet have their own nukes

[Pickle Picker Picking Pickles]

Originally posted by j.yellow28:

Originally posted by GODLUCIFER:

Russian T90M has over 170 Hull armour with moderate 125 CANNON,
Seems great, till you realize the earliest Japanese tank hits with a whopping 150-155MM Cannon and your Russian tank is useless, and it's WAY lower tier .
Imagine that .

my 1.0 150mm cannon with tracks says hi? ur point here is what exactly?

I can kill a 100mm gun wwith my 50m gun in a puma.

not 70% of the time that is, a 100mm will always get more wins / advantage overall in example best out of 5 tries, and to top it off, Japan has a dual 106 MM cannon tank, and in my opinion, 2x 100MM is better than 1x 150-180MM, and is a guaranteed kill.

[-NODER-_Novastorm_]

Gulf war the Iraq army had the most crap T72 versions and the ammo carried by those early T72s were mostly trainning ammo, also many of those were manual turrent transverse, in another words , Iraq buy the worst and cheap T72s and the outcome was all we know.
However the warfare was changing back then , as it still is , tanks / mbts are thing of the past now , its expensive and useless now armies having tanks.
In videogames tanks are fun to play , real life tanks are useless and many armies around the world will stop to have tanks .

[Predatortoast707]

Originally posted by Lancebringer:

Originally posted by Jager:

you blabing on history this is a game and russian beat everyone stop denying that

Ru didnt "Beat everyone"

We stopped at the river, thats the only reason we didnt take berlin.
Russia recently attacked the USA, got their asses handed to them, most died within 20 seconds, and the survivors got a medal for not getting killed.

Russia is losing the war in ukraine, no "winning" nation would rely upon the conscripts and supplies from a third world dictatorship if they were.

They "HAD" some good stuff, all of it blown to oblivion, as I said.

Drop the copium pipe and come back to reality

when did russia attack the US? am i missing some ww3 patch notes?