Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I prefer to play on range instead of cod style game play they are forcing on us
i get that, but can't Gaijin figure out how to make a happy medium? like i also hate playing super close quarters, but at the same time I hate getting sniped from across the map by a little pixel that is apparently a player. Like why cant they make a map with close quarters, a medium range area, and a long range area? like I feel theres a way to do that.
exactly
if they remove maps like maginot line they may as well just remove all TDs from the game, because they're gonna be obsolete....
It features some of the best AI targets to destroy in ground assault - French tanks. Only Japanese ones on Japan suffer from having even less armour.
No one realizes everyone has different preferences
Tbh, it's much easier to reach consensus within the community on which tank maps should stay in the game, rather than on which should be removed. Because only a fraction of them is good or at least playable to some extent...
Everyone likes and hates different things.
It doesn't work that way. Some maps could be easily fixed if the devs put some effort in them, so that a very small share of people would remain discontented like the eternal whiners whom it's impossible to satisfy. Other maps, at the same time...are broken from the very beginning, so tuning them to the decent state would effectively mean making an entirely new map.
I can't not compare it to the politics as an obvious analogy, where no single ruler or ruling party ever had 100% support, but there's a rule of thumb that with 70%+ support, you're likely doing great and will stay in power for long, while with 10%- support, say goodbye to your ambitions in the first place, and better think what you have done so wrong people don't like you. And you just mix together rare complaints that are often personal quirks of a certain small number of people with huge feedback from the majority on some serious problem that ruins the gaming experience on some map for, well, the majority of people. While the former is not a top priority thing for good devs, although it could be taken into consideration like problems that opposition in a country draws attention to, the latter is what needs working on in the first place, up to pulling some maps out of rotation to never appear in random battles again (if the number of problems is so high they can't be fixed, which is confirmed by the overwhelming discontent in the majority of the community), only leaving them for custom battles yes.
I vote we remove Berlin, march to the Rhein, abandoned factory, and any other small urban map I am forgetting
And bring back Kursk while they are at it, ‘fire arc’ is just a travesty barely covering the middle cap point of what was one of the better maps
And El Alamein should get its old spawns too, let those people who didn’t like to drive ten minutes through the desert to reach combat cry