Centurion Mk 3 vs 1943 tank? :: War Thunder General Discussions

Store Page

War Thunder

All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos News Guides Reviews

War Thunder > General Discussions > Topic Details

This topic has been locked

Foxtrot39

Dec 21, 2015 @ 11:44am

Centurion Mk 3 vs 1943 tank?

Shouldn't a tank like that be 6.7 isntead?

< >

Showing 31-34 of 34 comments

Bogs

Dec 23, 2015 @ 6:20pm

T10M (1960) against world war 2 tanks,

Shouldnt a tank with HEAT-FS it be 8.0 instead?

Last edited by Bogs; Dec 23, 2015 @ 6:20pm

#31

Katokevin

Dec 23, 2015 @ 6:30pm

I think the Centurion Mk.3 is fine where it is, but the FV 221 Caernarvon could use an increase due to the armor. I think for now it is just due to the lack of tanks. The US and Germany have 7 vehicles and the Soviets have 8 (not including SPAA) in Tier IV while the Brits have 5 (and only one has decent armor for the Tier compared to others). Once the tree is fully unlocked and more are released, I think we will see some changes. (My Caernarvon almost feels like the IS-3 when it had a low BR and clubed the 6.7 range before it was changed.)

#32

Grizzk

May 5, 2017 @ 4:56am

The caernarvon is worse than the Centurion tank for the armour. Its a bigger target and has tons of easy to kill areas. I would agree the Centurion deserves a higher BR but also needs all the ♥♥♥♥ removed from it. The gun is far superior to what's made out, the armour far more effective. Mobility was always adequete. Ammo placement is crap? Its not in the turret so that point is mute. Germany Panther A & G should be 5.7 at least, Tiger lowered too. Tiger II needs a little bit of lowering but its hull is not supposed to be that good. T32 is OP, T34 and T29 are just good heavy tanks with bad reloading guns.

Post war? APDS was made in 1944 for the 17 and 6 pounder guns. The round is not post war, APDS-FS. HEAT-FS should be stupidly expensive as it was in short supply and is overrated. That pen is no more effective than that on the APDS, as no tank has the thickness to compare but instead have techniques that counter HEAT better than AP rounds so... APDS is better, because it has a more flat trajectory and the enemy cannot evade as easily. HESH rounds are arguable but even the 105 can deal with all U.S.S.R tanks, and the bigger ones kill everything but the Maus.

Get rid of the T-44? No, its fun to play and I've only had a few matches in it. I'd also not complain about tanks being ♥♥♥♥. I would say though they need to change the game so its not always 16 vs 16 or whatever numbers, instead making them uneven depending on the ranking of tanks to make it fair that way. Quality vs Quantity.

#33