WT Ground Forces, Armored Warfare or WoT?

[Nevu]

I'm kinda stumped between those 3, I have tried WoT, it's pretty cool and all, just bothers me that you get 1 shot only in the match. Well, voice your opinions, WT GF is pretty cool with realism, X-ray when you hit someone, but WoT is nice too, and Armored Warfare looks cool.

[Lord Headass]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Nexio |PrayForFrance|:

I'm kinda stumped between those 3, I have tried WoT, it's pretty cool and all, just bothers me that you get 1 shot only in the match. Well, voice your opinions, WT GF is pretty cool with realism, X-ray when you hit someone, but WoT is nice too, and Armored Warfare looks cool.

Really don't see why you'd come here to ask this. But anyways, try to ingnore the trolls that complain about the Russian bias. It is a thing just I don't see it too much (I am American tier 5 main) but it's a very fun game to play for leisure. At least all in my opinion.

[Nevu]

Yeah, I'm thinking about sticking to WT, as WoT is too arcadish for my style, as I need a mix between arcadish and realistic, so yeah. Not sure about AW, though. Heard bad things about it's launcher.

[Tankfriend]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Nexio |PrayForFrance|:

Heard bad things about it's launcher.

Don't know what bad things those are supposed to be - I'm running it since the stress test and never had any issues with it.
Either way, AW is basically a polished version of WoT with modern tanks, so it's probably going to be too arcadey for your taste.

[Legionary Guard]

Play RO2 and keep spawning in the Panzer IV.

[Nevu]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Tankfriend:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Nexio |PrayForFrance|:

Heard bad things about it's launcher.

Don't know what bad things those are supposed to be - I'm running it since the stress test and never had any issues with it.
Either way, AW is basically a polished version of WoT with modern tanks, so it's probably going to be too arcadey for your taste.

Wel, I kinda like for example - Abrams tank and so on. I was kinda wrong about it being too arcadey, it's just you get 1 life.

[Rumpelcrutchskin]

I played them all and WT is still best from the bunch altough the recent changes like removing the tank zoom and 7.7 BR change are really starting to take its toll on enjoyment of this game.
The health bar system in WoT and AW is just not for me.
If I had to choose between WoT and AW then AW is better, it's probably where I will retreat if Gaijin devs will keep killing off this game with stupid decisions.

[relliK]

there is still lot of work to do for the devs of Armored Warfare (imho) - graphics on the highest settings look like WT on medium and why would they put up mission objectives when they are completely irrelevant to the game ?!? i mean in AW (and WoT as well) it's definitely more rewarding to just go for enemy tanks and in the end the team killing more enemies will win the battle -period- while in WT going for the objective is actually winning battles and players that are doing it will be rewarded which means that even players that are using (or HAVE to use) inferior tanks can win battles and be the top scorer (without any kills even - been there, done that).

[Nevu]

Also, the bad thing about the launcher is that I heard it eats your bandwidth, so yeah, don't wanna risk that. [My.com launcher]

[Bogey]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Nexio |PrayForFrance|:

Also, the bad thing about the launcher is that I heard it eats your bandwidth, so yeah, don't wanna risk that. [My.com launcher]

It does, but as long as you remember to shut it down after you used it you're ok (it doesn't do that by itself for some reason ...).

Armored Warfare is pretty much a WoT clone btw, even more arcadish than WoT in my opinion, and the MM doesn't work very well right now because of the small player base. It's still in open beta though, and at least the tanks and AFVs will be reworked into HD at some point.