安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
I had many occasions when shooting exact same spot on same tank that soviet ballistic cap ammo killed with one shot and Panther just failed to kill.
Same thing happens a lot when you compare IS-2 with Tiger II, IS-2 shot kills, Tiger II shot in the same place just sprays the cabin with damage and tank lives.
Funny considering how overnerfed German tanks are...
Leopard is going 20kph slower on flat ground than it should
Maus is missing 20mm of turret armor
Maus/Jagdtiger are missing APDS
Maus/Jagdtiger are missing 40mm of pen with standard AP
Tiger II is missing 5% of its armor
T-54 gets ridiculous theoretical reload rate of ~6 rounds per minute, yet Panther doesn't get its ridiculous theoretical reload rate of 20 rounds per minute.
Leo 1/M60 are missing 50mm of pen with APDS.
Maus has 3x the repair cost os the T-10 in AB
Leopard has 2k more repair cost than the T-54 in AB
The list goes on.... So many nerfs have been made to German tanks that Russian tanks don't have to deal with. This game is basically "Hey, let's get rid of all the advantages German tanks had historically but keep all the disadvantages, and let's get rid of all the disadvantages of Russian tanks but keep all the advantages.
The T-34-85 and -100 are both glass cannons, their armour may as well not even be there but their mobility more than makes up for it. In my opinion, the Panther F and T-34-85 are a good match for each other, maybe even a little swayed in the F's favor. The Panther II of course would be too much for the -85 but the -100 would match it well.
and welcome back Golden.
there 1 to 1.3 BR between panther F and T34-85, so 3 to 4 ''classes''. Point panther is the only one I never played.
I just finished a battle with a 5.7 battle line tiger H1 panther D and JPIV 70 vomag. I had 6.7 germans big asses in front of me. It s a bit no match. I have never this problem with a 5.3/5.0 russian battle line. You can possibly have hard time but it s roughly fair.
It will anyway finish, I will boycott any game with my 5.7 battle including 6.7, not play, play AA or quite. BR prb is anyway an other matter.
It seems to me t34-85 and panther are about the same class, each one have advantages and weakness toward the other. I anyway prefer the t34-85. Just the reverse speed on panther is a pain, that make it a poor dancer (hit and run on cover). T34-85 anyway beat panther in any compartment for speed and agility.
More armour, only for front plate, and a weakenes on the lower front corner of the turret. For the gun, it s penetration VS damage. For movement it s all for the T34.
As high could be the panther penetration, It s improtant to keep in mind what they will have to fight. T34-85 are always weaker in the average due to it s lower BR.
Now if I imagine I fight in a tiger and in front of me is a panther or a T34-85, I will be equally careful for both.
I asked the question to know if I was alone to think the BR difference was not optimum between these tanks, and possibly to know where my analysis failed if I was wrong.
Thanks for feel back.
I started post with At least in arcade. I dont played so much RB. it s interresting but queue time is too long. I heard also people tend to camp around ennemy spawn point early in rb (probably to solve ennemy detection that in not on ''assist mode in RB''. It never happened to me, however.
Perhaps you can start a post to know why people play arcade so much, and disregard Realist battle.