Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
As recent wars have shown many many modern tanks from all sides are very vulnerable because they often share the same weakpoins. Also IRL the only opponent the merkava faces are RPGs, ATGMs and drones so its hard to tell how it would stand in a tank vs tank fight without somebody releasing tons of classified files.
Do you think that other tanks do not keep their specifications secret? :) Think Gaijin has access to all military specifications, e.g. American, German machines? :D That this is publicly available information? Like the post above, think that the T90M met in open combat against e.g. Leopard 2A7? :D This is about the comparison factor with other tanks, where the Ram Sagol is a completely ridiculous tank, which has lower resistance and survivability than the stupid SPAA, or a paper tank, which is obviously nonsense. This is about the fact that the smaller armor that is perpendicular will last longer than the RS armor that is thicker and is at an angle. Just as it is spaling, which is literally crazy to create a small projectile from a 30mm autocannon spaling as a projectile from a 150mm cannon. I'm not betting on the fact that the RS doesn't hold up as much as Leo, the T tank, or the Abrams on the same BR, but on the fact that this tank is nothing, even tanks from the BR 9.3 can be shot in one shot, which is completely ridiculous and unrealistic. This is simply a nerf from Gaijin, nothing more. Merkavi were much stronger in the past than today, but today they are mysteriously weak and too much. I literally have the feeling that maybe even a handgun will destroy that tank.
The question is, how much have you played so that you can compare what kind of tank can withstand and what abilities it has on its BR. :D
Yes, everyone who has researched at least 5-6 top tier nations in this game, or knows how to compare, knows something about the Russian tree. But I'm not writing about the top tier, Ram Sagol is BR 11.3 and as I wrote, this tank will destroy any BR 10.3 tank in one shot without any problems. At the same time, the thickness of the armor as well as the angles of the armor should clearly be in favor of this tank, but this is not the case, miraculously the armor does not work, while it works much better on lower BR tanks that have worse armor, worse angles.
it has no other vehicles to put with it in line up , so you gotta use 9.3 tanks that will possibly be facing 10.7 things , i hate these devs sometimes they seem so clueless with the things that they do.
Given the Equipment of their neighbours (which is predominatly older T Series), the Merkava would be likely designed to withstand their Guns at least.
You can also see from recent wars that stuff like the abrams tank has a high casualty rate (20 out of 31 were destroyed).
Why do people have this mysterious Believe that tanks are these invulnerable beasts on the battlefield when many many times they were proven wrong over and over again that you just have to hit them once to force the crew to abandon them.
The question is whether Israel offers it for export at all. Another thing, it depends on many different factors such as price, crew training, servicing. You imagine it very simply, tanks are not sold like bread in the store. Do you really think that if someone designed this tank, so much energy, time, etc. that he only created a paper thing that could not withstand anything? :D Do you think Israeli engineers are complete idiots who don't know anything and build a tank like a car for a shop? But come on... Your ideas are a bit childish, inexperienced. And that's the point, as you wrote, the T-80s were only very average tanks in reality, while in the game they are strong and resist even the most modern tanks. :D And I've already played all these tanks, Israel is almost the last nation in this game that I'm researching, that's why I was surprised by the senselessly low resistance. It is primarily the MBT tank of a state like Israel, which has been threatened by its surroundings, in a military state, for its entire history. Do you really believe that such a country will create a paper nonsense as its MBT tank? :D
You can also see from recent wars that stuff like the abrams tank has a high casualty rate (20 out of 31 were destroyed).
Why do people have this mysterious Believe that tanks are these invulnerable beasts on the battlefield when many many times they were proven wrong over and over again that you just have to hit them once to force the crew to abandon them. [/quote]
Where were 21 Abrams destroyed out of 31 in a tank battle? :) I want to know that, please. Because Abrams are famous in tank battles precisely because they have almost no losses, except for their own teamkills. :D And of course every tank is destructible, I wrote about something else, I won't repeat myself.