Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Just look at IRL air show footage of it, it performs way better compared to the trash flight model we have ingame. Same for the mig 29, remember that plane had mock dog fights against f16 IRL after the german reunification and it won most of the times.
Muh russian bias.
That is only part of it. The inherently poor game design makes single-death leavers the norm, and since more USA premiums are bought than any other nation, (for obvious reasons) it makes killing the first wave of USA vehicles all that's needed to win the entire match. This has nothing to do with the player, and everything to do with the game design.
Better players, inherently poor game design.
When your turrets are impenetrable frontally by the M829A1, despite the total lack of any real world proof of it outside of Russian "because I said so comrade" documents, yes it is bias.
>Fly full afterburner
>Shoot fox 1/3 at guys flying high
>Go in for the kill at the end of guys flying below you at the end of the match
>Dog fight
Basically what you did in your first comment lol. USA armaments are superior to any counterpart, konechno verim, tovarish'. Don't forget to send more of those to active warzones to prove that to the world once again.