Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Its true, however at least they do a good job with light tanks and spaa. so why not? it would be interesting. Also I think it would be a good idea to add South Korea as a subtree. After all, it has a relationship with Türkiye.
Youre right about that. it can be also subtree for germany.
https://forum.warthunder.com/t/turkish-ground-forces-tech-tree/10625
At first glance, it looks already better than the Ukrainian tree proposed earlier. At least there's a variation of gameplay and so many vehicles resembling what numerous other nations already have (or don't have at all) that the entire tree is like nothing else (0_0 ) I mean, it was like 'Hm, that looks American...oh, Sweden...Italy? Wait...', and then come German and Russian-like vics, so...could be of much use.
I personally liked the SPAA line, HİSAR-A is dope ngl, as if Skynet designed it :D
Yeah, I didnt like all medium tanks. but I like more light and spaa tanks. I mean they look insteresting, strong and annoying? If it's not a complete copy, I think it wouldn't harmless to add it.