Stingers: a story of the Snail being biased

[French Cat]

Remember that time when the Snail said “If Igla missile can’t do this, then no one else can!!” People say Russian bias ain’t real, but c’mon… The stinger and other NATO manpads are the clearest example of it. They refused to believe the G-limit, max speed, and maneuverability of NATO manpads because Russian ones couldn’t match them. Now we’re left with 13g stingers (which can be flared) and 16g missiles for France (I don’t play it so maybe I’m wrong). Meanwhile Russia got an 20g unflarable missile. Why no give useless something on par with Strela :<

[bastion of pragmatism]

yeah man Russian bias the stinger and mistral are terrible oh yeah the su25 and ka52 are completely invincible too and don’t forget about the t90m front plate…

[Beverain]

the new flavour of the month op russain tank is the latest in a line of "bias" they certainly don't do

only 1 prototype of it was ever built, why? cause it failed field trails. and yet its enough to add a whole new fantasy tank.

gaijin will never say there is a bias against nato, but they certainly will implement crack pipe prototypes and designs for the soviets (the newest event tank is proof of that)

gaijin is full of double standards, if it doesn't have a soviet flag on it, its gonna get neutered. regardless of any amount of documentation that is provided

[nuke]

i enjoy reading russian bias threads, its almost like a group of people cant stop blaming a single nation for their lack of skill

[LordBUM]

Originally posted by nuke france:

i enjoy reading russian bias threads, its almost like a group of people cant stop blaming a single nation for their lack of skill

normally i would agree but in this case the complaint is justified.

[CaptainSpacetime]

Yeah I still laugh sometimes irl at how blatant it was.

Like literally just "Russia cannot make this missile therefore it's not real"

They're gonna add aircraft carriers but all the US ones will spontaneously combust because according to extensive admiral kuznetsov documents this is totally normal.

[Chaoslord 87]

Originally posted by CaptainSpacetime:

Yeah I still laugh sometimes irl at how blatant it was.

Like literally just "Russia cannot make this missile therefore it's not real"

They're gonna add aircraft carriers but all the US ones will spontaneously combust because according to extensive admiral kuznetsov documents this is totally normal.

Meanwhile the Moskva sunk by an invisible storm, created by NATO´s top secret weather machine.....

[xCrossFaith]

Arent Stingers widely known to be janky overall? Neither of the NATO AA's I use feel weak at all

Also the unflarable missiles you say the Strela has... That's why it's important to play more than one nation because *Laughs in Type 81*

[Col. Cornbread]

Originally posted by CaptainSpacetime:

Yeah I still laugh sometimes irl at how blatant it was.

Like literally just "Russia cannot make this missile therefore it's not real"

They're gonna add aircraft carriers but all the US ones will spontaneously combust because according to extensive admiral kuznetsov documents this is totally normal.

All they can do is lie about how great the Russian military is, which is hilarious because they just conform the stereotype that Russians can only lie.

[MissNurseXochi]

Do you think they're gonna fix it?



lol i doubt they will

W E L C O M E __T O __G A I J I N !

[nuke]

Originally posted by Munk Chuncher:

Originally posted by nuke france:

i enjoy reading russian bias threads, its almost like a group of people cant stop blaming a single nation for their lack of skill

USSR main spotted.

yeah, sure, the highest br ussr tank i have is t54 from 7.7
however i did play italy and sweden top tier and never had a problem with rooskie tanks

[French Cat]

Originally posted by xCrossFaith:

Arent Stingers widely known to be janky overall? Neither of the NATO AA's I use feel weak at all

Also the unflarable missiles you say the Strela has... That's why it's important to play more than one nation because *Laughs in Type 81*

Type 81 doesn't pull 30Gs broski, its dodgeable

[xCrossFaith]

Originally posted by Kitty Cat:

Originally posted by xCrossFaith:

Arent Stingers widely known to be janky overall? Neither of the NATO AA's I use feel weak at all

Also the unflarable missiles you say the Strela has... That's why it's important to play more than one nation because *Laughs in Type 81*

Type 81 doesn't pull 30Gs broski, its dodgeable

You are right.. It doesn't pull 30.. It pulls 35.

As said, it's important to play more than one nation :P

[biomike]

Originally posted by Venom Thanos:

Originally posted by LordBUM:

normally i would agree but in this case the complaint is justified.

Maybe they are just better at building tanks and planes? Remember who went to space first bro even their dogs went to space, if everyone else are better why don't they get there first lol

Germany with the V2 rocket, thats who got things into space first

[Col. Cornbread]

Originally posted by xCrossFaith:

You are right.. It doesn't pull 30.. It pulls 35.

As said, it's important to play more than one nation :P

Tor m1 is listed at 42g overload, but it cant pull more than a 4g turn.

Originally posted by Venom Thanos:

Maybe they are just better at building tanks and planes? Remember who went to space first bro even their dogs went to space, if everyone else are better why don't they get there first lol

They are bad at building everything.

[French Cat]

Originally posted by xCrossFaith:

Originally posted by Kitty Cat:

Type 81 doesn't pull 30Gs broski, its dodgeable

You are right.. It doesn't pull 30.. It pulls 35.

As said, it's important to play more than one nation :P

Correction: It doesn't pull 15Gs