Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Watch Dollarplays video where he destroys 269's from various angles using the (6.7) T34's HE round. That kind of play is perhaps beyond the skill of many; but he shows just how vulnerable the 269 actually is. Disclaimer: I don't have the 269. It didn't interest me; so I didn't grind the event.
True
Reality is, in BR <8.7 match 1 279 can one shot 5/6 enemies, for comparison, take a look at T55AM1 or T64A their stock round are way "weaker" than 279 and they can be penned frontally, but 362mm APHE ? in 8.7? and frontally immune to all conventional and most APDS ammo? 279 should be moved to 9.0 at least
Vulnerable? The 279? NO. Leo 1 APDS rounds will do almost nothing to a 279...I mean, you have small chance to kill his driver but that's kind of it....to kill a 279 with a Leo 1 APDS round you'd need to kill his driver, take out his gun then his tracks and keep killing the driver, something you can't afford to waste time on at that BR as most tanks are very fast and somebody will come and help the 279 shortly after you shoot him. Heat is a guaranteed driver kill and a 50/50 when shooting the frontal plate to the side enough that you'll get the ammo but not enough to hit a stupid angle. Haven't grinded APFSDS yet on the A1A1. The turret is a no go for any dart with less than 400mm pen.
the fact that the tank barley has armor to stop 7.92 which most german tanks use, is what makes it impossible to 1 shot unless you hit the ammo, because the round explosive fuse wont activate with its paper armor, its actually an advantage to have thin armor, because other tanks will need 2-3 shots to finish you off, the tank makes no sense that on most winning games theres italian m18s lifting the team up
throwing insults around without providing any useful discussion wont help your case
im currently grinding the chinese tech tree(has a combo of best russian and american tanks, including m18) so ill play the m18 soon and update you on how it feels dominating the battlefield, hell i might even start saying it doesnt need nerfing just so it can keep going under the gaijin radar and i can keep getting outrageous amounts of kills with it.
Thin armor hullbreaks as soon as you hit a component like the engine, though HEAT is the most likely round to do that.
a nerf isnt putting m18 up the battlerating, a nerf is lowering the speed/acceleration to a reasonable amount
when the italian fast lunchbox came everyone started whining about it, despite the fact that it only has a machine gun,not a tank gun like the m18 has,
but then the same people defend the m18? why? isnt that hypocritical...