Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Gaijin at the moment is basically treating NATO tanks as if they have next to no kinetic protection and that none of them have spall liners (something that's been a fundamental feature for many tanks ranging from M60 to Challenger 2 for decades).
It's still the dev server so nothing is final, but it's not looking great.
I’m no tank expert but don’t other modern countries tanks have a spall liner, like I would imagine the Abrahams does, it was designed with crew survivability in mind after all.
The 2a7 will certainly be a good tank though.