Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
same goes to japan the Type10 isnt used in high numbers, but just a simple fact that japan has their most modern tanks but no one else does.
Many complain because the vehicles are still missing certain traits.
For example:
-The Type 10 was designed to be faster and more agile than the Type 90 but it´s not ingame. It also misses it´s modular armor package.
-The Arietes have composite hull armor at least on par with Leo 2a4 but ingame it has spaced armor in the UFP.
Russia is a different they have only a few amount of tanks but a ton of variants and all of these modernizations, at the moment they have enough tanks more modern T-80BVM or T-90M make only sense when the others also arrive strongpoint STRV-122 Leopard2A8, as for usa there are no further ones but they could still add a few more abrams or a new bradley.
This comes from OTO Melara.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230126040024/https://www.iveco-otomelara.com/tracked/ArieteMBT.php
It would be a very strange design choice to opt for spaced hull armor in 1994, then every other uses composite armor since decades earlier.
So Gaijin has access to Russia's top secret documents regarding the 3BM60 round- which went into service in 2016? Or is that all guesswork they're doing?
Russia doesnt have their 3BM59 or 3BM70 either, the BVM should have 3BM59 available and the T-90M should be able to use the 3BM70.