Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
As for the 105 its in a alright spot its fast enuf and can pull G's to doudge some missles and can dogfight if needed and get a base. Not a amazing plane but its ok.
It was brought up over the next couple months, and was pretty balanced. It's on par with the F-4C all things considered. Now we have the Su-25, and everything that hasn't been added since then is in the same spot - a good air frame that suffers against missiles it can't dodge.
As for the F-111, it is functionally the exact same plane with a couple more bombs and flares. It could go to 10.7 reasonably, but it would really struggle in Air RB.
It used to even be good in ground realistic, but ever since ground IR was introduced it made the entire aircraft unplayable in this mode.
In air realistic it's technically playable, but there is no justification for using it. F-104 for example is only at 9.3 and has same cannon with enough ammo (750rnd compared to it's 1000rnds) and is much faster.
And then you have F-111A that is only 0.3 higher (plays in same battles). Has twice the ammo, faster, larger payload and flares that F-105D doesn't get.
Only positive difference is that F-105D gets AIM-9E's, while others get AIM-9B's. Which is NOT worthy trade off.