Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
russian mains say its bad...
You know what it is good at? Surviving shots that would normally take you out giving you ample time to load your gun, and position yourself to return fire to the guy who just shot at you after you’ve taken no damage.
I agree, lots of noobs play NATO nations for some reason so certainly a chunk of kills comes from that, but like I said, I was completely stock with my little BM42 and was able to win 5/6 of my games, along with the other swarms of T90s and BVMs.
If they gave spall liners to Abrams maybe more skilled players would want to play USA, therefore balancing out W/L ratio somewhat. That is really the most concerning part, it’s completely and utterly unfair and nobody can deny it, Russia mains will cope deny it so they can keep things the way they are which is unfortunate, but some people like to see the world burn I guess.
Even if they didn’t want to give the Abrams a spall liner for whatever reason, they should make battles Russia vs Russia. “Realistic” battles where nations of similar interests teamed up are no longer a thing. You can be in an American Sherman on a team with a German tiger and that nowadays is completely normal.
Like I said before, if nothing else Russia should be facing Russia for the time being, just to even things out.
I also started out focusing on Russia, I have the Su27 and obviously the T90M, and I realize how bad this is for the game.
The new leopard is good, but it is once again worse in the survivability category, out of those 19 kills I killed a couple of the new A7s with ease, one blasted a round right through my side, doing no damage so I fired at him and one shot him.
Realistically any top tier tank is good if you get the first shot off and you take the enemies gun breach. Literally any tank in the game other than the T90 can be one shot with ease, with the T90 it is somewhat random when you will be able to score successful one shots. The only counter to the T90 at the moment is kill it’s breach and put enough rounds into it to hopefully eventually kill it, which is also an option in killing any other top tier tank, but with the T90 it is damn near a requirement unless the enemy gets a shot at you from directly behind you.
One faction gets supersuit that can dramatically increase the survival rate of getting shot, as well as a gun that is more than capable of performing at it's job.
The other faction gets just a gun with a little bit better reload speed, well that is a cool perk, other than the faction it plays against can negate getting shot entirely, making your reload speed not as strong as it sounds.
Nothing is fair about that scenario, and that is currently what it is like at top tier.
lmao gr8 b8 m8
/Ariete has entered the chat
So you have the T90M and just want to continue clubbing seals, got it. I wish people could put their pride of their country and just have their mind of having a fun and balanced game, instead of one nation with a 60%+ winrate, that is an issue.
I one shot all those tanks all the time, sometimes like you said the crew spacing is an issue, but that is rare compared to the T90M, but everything might as well be spaced in the T90 with the spall liner.