Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
skill.
Russian tanks are over performing, but I am convinced the issue is that NATO players, Germans and US specifically, are for the most part, full of idiots.
The Pantsir and Vikhr AGM's are just too much. The russians basically get guaranteed air superiority every battle.
As for air battles it's probably because of top tier premium jet like F-4S Phantom II ruining the team. Filled with players that don't even get proper keybinds to use their jet and have no idea what they are doing.
true, selling Prem Top Tier with no crew no line up and no game expierence is a cocktail for unpleasent game play. New players will be disappointed and leave. 70-80 of our sqaudron does not play top tier, some others having fun shooting down noobs in the "best" jet.
The problem is finding a competent Abrams player
Hmmmm
This is not an issue of Russian vehicles. Yes, they over perform. However NATO teams are just objectively worse than their counterparts.
I can't count the amount of times I have seen an Abrams or 2a6 just drive past enemies as if they aren't even looking at their screen. This part is nothing in particular to do with Russia, but the NATO players are just so much worse.
As it turns out...the game is just more fun at lower tiers, partially because of the economy.