Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
US West (Northern California, Oregon)
US East (Northern Virginia, Ohio)
Canada
Europe (Paris, Frankfurt, Ireland, London,
Brazil (Sao Paolo)
Australia (Sydney)
Asia (Beijing, Mumbai, Tokyo, Singapore)
I have been pestering the devs about EXACTLY this for years lol
If they would let us redistribute our wealth to others then long time players with currently zero reason to have a premium account, other than cosmetics, would suddenly have a very good reason to buy one.
It would also help massively with teams that have issues with low morale or over-passivity and would likely reduce the sodium content of both forums by a considerable amount.
I also don't know if they actually use the top of the line servers. Some are as low as $11 per hour
God mogami informing the masses
its a backdoor to bullying
The suggested SL-sharing mechanism could potentially lead to exploitative behavior within squadrons. For instance, it may encourage players to force a member with a large SL bank to put up a bounty from their account for a game. In exchange for this bounty, they may offer to keep the player in the squadron, which is an unfair practice. This behavior could then become a pattern of exploitation and could be used for personal gain or punishment. Therefore, it is important to consider the potential negative consequences before implementing such a mechanism.
100%
Why, why would you as a company change a runnig system that provides you money with little to no efford? There is no reason.
So sad but true no Post will change anything ever here, as long the money flows it would be stupid of them to change anything. I don't know how old the OP is but do you think they are interested in a fun fair game (maybe in their 20s or eraly 30s) or making money to have a fun life for them and their familys? Of course its the later. The Time when games are made by gamers for being a game to enjoy are long gone. Sad but fact and not limited to WT it is a general direction of the industry (with little to no eceptions).