AI involved in their recent apology

[Starz]

So, I couldnt help but wonder how much of their most recent apology announcement got written by AI.

So, I tried a couple websites:

contentatscale.ai -> 61% would be written by AI
gptzero.me -> very likely AI is involved
zerogpt -> very likely AI is involved
Seo.ai -> very likely AI is involved
Smodin.io -> very likely AI is involved

Now, i'll go ahead and say that I usually dont bother with AI detection so, take these sites with some salt and the results non-definitive.

But the possibility of AI being involved into writing that message isnt unthinkable either.

[tamyao]

could just be because DeepL or Googletranslate was used to translate from russian to english, should result in the same detection

[MaDeuce]

It doesn't matter if AI generates it or not, the act of publishing means they concur with the sentiments. The idea that they didn't have the aptitude to string together the words in such a sequence is irrelevant to the conveyed message.

[^0[.SAS.]^4HunterCat]

dude its standart apology in 2023 for gaming industry.
"we deeply sorry blah blah, we will provide road map blah blah, we sure gonna work on making game better blah blah"
They could'v just post a video from South park with same effect. This one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQhmGIW7MVU
No wounder it gets triggered by AI checking site cuz of how standart it is.

[Canadian Guitar]

Originally posted by Starz:

So, I couldnt help but wonder how much of their most recent apology announcement got written by AI.

So, I tried a couple websites:

contentatscale.ai -> 61% would be written by AI
gptzero.me -> very likely AI is involved
zerogpt -> very likely AI is involved
Seo.ai -> very likely AI is involved
Smodin.io -> very likely AI is involved

Now, i'll go ahead and say that I usually dont bother with AI detection so, take these sites with some salt and the results non-definitive.

But the possibility of AI being involved into writing that message isnt unthinkable either.

So is the US Constitution according to AI detectors...

[Wandering Flare]

It detects AI involvement because AI has to learn off of something and the only thing it has to learn from are templates written by people, so it's not an AI-generated apology, just one that could as well be a copy-pasted of hundreds of others.

[mogami_99]

Originally posted by Canadian Guitar:

Originally posted by Starz:

So, I couldnt help but wonder how much of their most recent apology announcement got written by AI.

So, I tried a couple websites:

contentatscale.ai -> 61% would be written by AI
gptzero.me -> very likely AI is involved
zerogpt -> very likely AI is involved
Seo.ai -> very likely AI is involved
Smodin.io -> very likely AI is involved

Now, i'll go ahead and say that I usually dont bother with AI detection so, take these sites with some salt and the results non-definitive.

But the possibility of AI being involved into writing that message isnt unthinkable either.

So is the US Constitution according to AI detectors...

Well those guys really were of super natural intelligence.

[kamikazi21358]

Originally posted by Canadian Guitar:

Originally posted by Starz:

So, I couldnt help but wonder how much of their most recent apology announcement got written by AI.

So, I tried a couple websites:

contentatscale.ai -> 61% would be written by AI
gptzero.me -> very likely AI is involved
zerogpt -> very likely AI is involved
Seo.ai -> very likely AI is involved
Smodin.io -> very likely AI is involved

Now, i'll go ahead and say that I usually dont bother with AI detection so, take these sites with some salt and the results non-definitive.

But the possibility of AI being involved into writing that message isnt unthinkable either.

So is the US Constitution according to AI detectors...

The US Constitution was invented by time travelers to sell more freedom? So of course it detected it!

[FizzyElf]

Originally posted by tamyao:

could just be because DeepL or Googletranslate was used to translate from russian to english, should result in the same detection

More than likely as there are a couple of errors in the post.

I feel it also bares mentioning that most of the research papers and summaries I have written for my college classes come up as AI assisted papers despite all of them predating novelai and chatgpt's big push into the main stream.

[Square Box]

I think it was written by a weasel.

[j.yellow28]

its better then them simply saying nothing and blocking comunication. they responded in a semi positive way that can be good for player

[Henry L Castle]

Just do your own research and run it through multiple AI detectors. All of my results suggest that this is a response written by a human. For the lols I even run the text through Chat GPT and this is what it said

"Based on the provided text, it is not possible to definitively determine whether it was written by an AI or a human. The text demonstrates a formal and apologetic tone, which could be characteristic of a message from a game developer or a customer service team addressing player concerns. While the text does not exhibit any obvious indications of being generated by an AI, it is worth noting that AI language models like myself are capable of producing coherent and human-like text, so it is increasingly challenging to distinguish between AI-generated content and human-written content based solely on the text itself. Additional context or information would be required for a more accurate assessment. "

And for the record, I'm not a fun of Gaijin, I just found it weird that the streamer was so easily convinced about that statement

[Patriot03]

I find this post interesting because regardless of it being true or not - The fact that now posts like this question the authenticity of public statements is startling in of itself.

Indeed, you probably won't ever be able to tell and more information than ever is increasingly authored by Artificial means rather than those of a human being.


It should be remembered that these chat AIs are best at manipulation more than anything else. (This is according to the people who made them, they're more convincing than they are accurate).



PS: The implication isn't even the issue of AI generated statements, but the fact that because it's even possible our trust of ANY statement artificial or otherwise is wavered. - The same applies to supposed "photographic evidence" which used to be reliable.

[76561199439813309]

I'd rather have AI write all their messages because holy ♥♥♥♥ they post some gibberish sometimes.

[shipdesignerdude]

It isn't unthinkable that AI is involved, but for a company of Gajin's size and how big their PR teams are across all the platforms I doubt it took more than an hour in a conference room to come up with this message.

[Cream Corn Lover]

AI detectors also think the treaty of versailles was written by ai. They are not reliable