Barrels can't be destroyed anymore?

[9imperator8]

Came back after a while. So barrels cannot be destroyed anymore or are they just much harder to damage? Shot a panzer 4 long 75 from the front right into the barrel tip with a panzer 3 short 75 and it didn't even turn yellow. Haven't also gotten my barrel damaged even once.

[CyberStonka]

It's still possible :)

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3031258457

[Chaoslink]

You can, there’s just a few details that make it more resilient to damage.

[9imperator8]

Originally posted by CyberStonka:

It's still possible :)

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3031258457

Okay, thanks for the answer. Just feels like barrels are able to take much more punishment than before.

[legaroojack]

Originally posted by CyberStonka:

It's still possible :)

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3031258457

imma keep it a buck 50 with you chief, tank barrels shouldnt bounce rounds like armour.

[OPFORS]

Originally posted by Legaroojack:

Originally posted by CyberStonka:

It's still possible :)

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3031258457

imma keep it a buck 50 with you chief, tank barrels shouldnt bounce rounds like armour.

Now in English.

[legaroojack]

Originally posted by TSR:

Originally posted by Legaroojack:

imma keep it a buck 50 with you chief, tank barrels shouldnt bounce rounds like armour.

Now in English.

It is in English, you just cant read basic sentences.

[OPFORS]

Originally posted by Legaroojack:

Originally posted by TSR:

Now in English.

It is in English, you just cant read basic sentences.

Imma is not a word, it is not in English. Go back to pre-school.

[legaroojack]

Originally posted by TSR:

Originally posted by Legaroojack:

It is in English, you just cant read basic sentences.

Imma is not a word, it is not in English. Go back to pre-school.

Skill issue chief. Seems like you're continuing to prove my point that you can't read.

[OPFORS]

Originally posted by Legaroojack:

Originally posted by TSR:

Imma is not a word, it is not in English. Go back to pre-school.

Skill issue chief. Seems like you're continuing to prove my point that you can't read.

Imma is not a word.

[legaroojack]

Originally posted by TSR:

Originally posted by Legaroojack:

Skill issue chief. Seems like you're continuing to prove my point that you can't read.

Imma is not a word.

Imma tell when I start caring, until then continue coping and seething.

[OPFORS]

Originally posted by Legaroojack:

Originally posted by TSR:

Imma is not a word.

Imma tell when I start caring, until then continue coping and seething.

Imma is still not a word.

[Chaoslink]

Originally posted by TSR:

Originally posted by Legaroojack:

Imma tell when I start caring, until then continue coping and seething.

Imma is still not a word.

I mean, that’s not really true. Languages change and adapt over time. People use the work Dunno plenty despite it technically not being a proper word. If it’s used enough, then it basically becomes a word because enough people know the meaning and can identify it well enough that it works when used. Therefore, it is a word.

I won’t give credit to texting shorts though. You wanna say “something” don’t type that four letter abomination at me. Not every word needs an abbreviation for texting.

[legaroojack]

Originally posted by TSR:

Originally posted by Legaroojack:

Imma tell when I start caring, until then continue coping and seething.

Imma is still not a word.

Show me where I said it was. Also as the other guy pointed out languages evolve over time. Compared to six hundred years ago you don't speak proper English and many of the phrases you use would have either not been used or would have been considered slang or the at the time equivalent of slang.

Get off your high horse my guy.

[Chaoslink]

Originally posted by Legaroojack:

Originally posted by TSR:

Imma is still not a word.

Show me where I said it was. Also as the other guy pointed out languages evolve over time. Compared to six hundred years ago you don't speak proper English and many of the phrases you use would have either not been used or would have been considered slang or the at the time equivalent of slang.

Get off your high horse my guy.

Its also one of those “attack the argument, not the man” concepts. It doesn’t matter if a person is a trained and skilled technician or a bum off the street, if their idea for a given problem works, who they are doesn’t really matter does it? Whether you speak “proper” English or not really has no weight in the efficacy of your arguments. People’s initial impression of it perhaps, but not the content of the argument itself.

[OPFORS]

Originally posted by Chaoslink:

Originally posted by TSR:

Imma is still not a word.

I mean, that’s not really true. Languages change and adapt over time. People use the work Dunno plenty despite it technically not being a proper word. If it’s used enough, then it basically becomes a word because enough people know the meaning and can identify it well enough that it works when used. Therefore, it is a word.

I won’t give credit to texting shorts though. You wanna say “something” don’t type that four letter abomination at me. Not every word needs an abbreviation for texting.

It was satire at first but since he became upset I thought I'd troll him.