Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Note to self: Dont use the TUSK mod. You are easier spotted and an HE to the bird cage is a quick and uneventful way to die. Also less weight = more speed.
The primary advantage the M1A2 SEP has is it has better thermal sights than the M1A2.
Those shots you're dying to in the M1A2 SEP would have also killed the M1A2. When you're playing top tier, you need to assume that anything you run into will OHK you and play accordingly. Never trust your armor because everything that's there is designed to defeat it. If your armor happens to stop a round, treat it as a happy accident that mitigated a mistake you made rather than you're a heavily armored behemoth that can stop anything thrown at you.
This mindset helps a lot with playing well at top tier. If you play like you're a glass canon, you make far less mistakes that will get you killed.
The cartoonist in accuracies of what they provide essentially make it into just a fictional figment of the great snails imagination.
Soviets have the best rounded line up to bring into a match between their MBTs, Light Tanks, SPAA, and CAS options, especially the CAS options. Between their support elements outside of the MBTs, they just have a lot of "I win" tools that haven't been available to most other nations.
The primary advantage of the Soviet MBTs is they have much smaller weak spot mistake thresholds compared to say an Abrams (it's also an issue with Leopards, Challenger, etc.).
The weak spot shots on an M1A2 might as well be the size of a soccer ball compared to T-80BVM's weak spots being the size of a tennis ball. You have a much more likelihood to mess up a shot on a T-80BVM's weak spot than you do an Abrams.
If you're playing at a tournament level, why wouldn't you use the vehicle that's going to more likely defeat a shot against it if your opponent makes a mistake vs. working harder to not make mistakes and limiting your engagement avenues in order to protect your weak spots?
Personally, I'd much rather have the Abrams as it gives me a lot more tactical options that I can employ to defeat a target in general ground battles that are super chaotic. However, if I'm in a tournament setting with other players that are as good, or better than me, there's no reason for me to pick the Abrams over the T-80s and potentially put myself at a disadvantage when I'm being shot at due to the larger weak spot mistake thresholds.
It's a solid example of "Work smarter, not harder."
M829A2 is a DU round.
In addition, penetration figures for Western ATGMs in War Thunder are way below the established figures. Not sure where the game got their figures, maybe the Russian MOD.