Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This is just another cry thread from soneone who can't play the game...
That said, the ERA and non-detonating ammo are definitely an advantage over other nations, especially considering the latter is supposed to be the exact opposite and a major downside of the T-series.
Pantsir S1, an anti-air system from 2012 fighting planes from the 90s or 80s and being able to shoot things down at ridiculous ranges.
To top it off - everything, that has multiple Vikhrs is toxic to play against. Nothing counters it, except complete air superiority and good luck achieving that with the Pantsir on the ground.
I do not understand this catering towards Russian tech. I'm a beginner game developer and it seems completely and utterly pointless to either politicize a game, or give a boost to your country's playerbase as catering or something, I have no clue as to why would someone favor a nation IN A GAME over the others. Balance is crucial in multiplayer games like War Thunder.
If USSR/Russia gets the Pantsir S1, then give Japan, Brits, France, USA stuff from 2010s too. Where's my F-35 to counter that, huh?
Pantsir is bad for the game, so is the new SU.
Even with beamriding nerf, the russian helicopters are still formidable, as they have MAW that prevents anyone from getting the drop on them and the Vihkr still has best range and velocity to a point it will wins helicopter vs helicopter combat easily.
To make matters worse they gave SU-39 Vihkr AGM's as well. Meaning it's the only jet capable of shooting down helicopters with missiles at range. While everyone els has to get point blank and likely get shotdown instead.
Then you have Pantsir thats been given air spawnkilling capabilities that you cannot detect and has no blindspot. When 2S6 apparently wasn't good enough, but why not give them TOR-1 instead then? It's already in the game, is a russian vehicle and good enough for chinese faction.
Also to point out about Pantsir. Why did Gaijin considered the russian faction to be in desperate need of a new top tier SPAA? When Japanese been capped at 9.0 in their SPAA line for years. These Gaijin excuses aren't fooling anyone.
i can kill them too. Just aim for the millimetre wide weak spots right?
You can't read properly. Why don't you try grinding out challenger 2E and then see if you can find a way to be competitive. The tank that has a single 'strong spot' and pretty much every other part of it's lard ass is a 'weak spot'.
Please explain the swarms of T80 BVMs i encounter one match out of 2. How is that fair?
yep all this I agree with - only now I realise after 1000 hours of grinding British, $100+ of premium accounts and a lot of wasted GE purchases along the way....
Should have known, the game is a Russian trick all along...
I play Challangers just u know it and i still find that russsian tanks are more easy to kill than Abrams for example, just becausse YOU can't do it means that nobody can, better L2P.
My t-80B with 40% winrate? It was 37% last week (i have yet to try the others)
As main russia i dont know why they add pantsir when we have 2s6 wonderful spaa
Maybe because you whine too much, at least to have a reason? :D
i think you are lying